Burnside Writers Collective
..
...
...
..
Secondary menu
.. Collective Home .. Store
Support BWC
 
General  |  Archives

The Emergent Church-Al Qaeda Connection

Jordan Green
 1  |  2       // < PREV |
target_shooting.jpg

6. Pastore gets in to some weird ground when he claims the Bible is no more true than “the funny papers”.

I don’t know what this had to do with Al Qaeda and the Emergent Church, but it made me mad because I think the Bible is more true than the “funny papers”. I like reading the Sermon on the Mount over Luann’s travails and triumphs as an adolescent girl any day. But, like “Garfield”, I do love lasagna.

Frank, no one calls them the “funny pages” anymore. They’re “comics”. It’s one thing for your careless reporting to result in the ritual executions of three of my key moles. It’s another to use words like you’re 87 years old.

7. Pastore ends with some strong thoughts and a poignant quote from Yogi Berra, who once said, “Half of this game is 90% mental.”

It was never said truer, Frank and Yogi. Never said truer. But I believe NBA veteran Jalen Rose and former Michigan Wolverine said it even truer than that when he told us, “Winning is the cure all. Sometimes when you’re losing things aren’t as bad as they seem. Sometimes when you’re winning things are not as good. It’s only one game but hopefully it’s something we can build on.”

Look, the truth is out. While the Emergent Church is difficult to define, more and more young Christians are bowing to the pressure of moderate thoughts and the wussier aspects of Jesus’s words. The “Emergents” like to focus on the Beatitudes, and that whole “turn the other cheek thing”, completely ignoring context. They disregard when Jesus coined the phrase “Fight fire with fire” in Luke and when God told every one of us to collect 200 foreskins from our enemies.

These shifts have already cost the Christian Right. For a while, things seemed great. Sure, terrorists blew up the World Trade Center, but America was still on the road to tax breaks for Thomas Kinkade paintings and automatic weapons alike. The Christian Right had control, but then the Emergent Church/Al Qaeda began gaining ground, electing Democrats and moderate Republicans in droves. Now, our soccer moms will be lucky to keep their tax breaks on their Chrysler Aspens.

The war is on, and the Christian Right must strike while Emergents are yet unarmed. The enemy may be difficult to identify. After all, they are in our churches, walking our streets and listening to Christian bands.

Not to worry: here are some quick ways to identify your enemies.

- Pipe smoking
- Spiky hair that may be frosted at the tips
- Frequently uttering words like “Dude” and “Bro”
- Shirts that say, “Jesus Is My Homeboy”
- Carrying copies of the Bible with covers adorned by snowboarders, skateboarders, or other “extreme athletes”
- Any youth at your church who enters a bar
- Facial hair referred to as “goatees” and wire-rimmed glasses. (Note: This is an important distinction. For instance, I have a goatee and glasses, but my glasses are wireless-rimmed. Therefore, I am not Emergent.)
- Familiarity with Nooma videos
- Listening to U2, Coldplay, or other Brit-pop bands on white “MP3 players”

And so the great battle begins.

 1  |  2 
End

Posted on July 30, 2007 12:00 AM
HR

Comments

I read the TH article. I didn't realize that termites leave droppings.

Guess I learn something new every day.

Love it! I couldn't believe it when I read his article. It's really a sad way to live, isn't it?

I wrote my own response here.

Ruanima.com

Not to blow anymore of Jordan's cover, but this implicates the Church of England also, given the role of N.T. Wright's work in Emergent Church "theology".

God bless you, Frank. You and your 72 ounce steak holding stomach.

Great article. I must say, I never saw the connection. I also didn't know my church was actually a mosque/islamic extremist base.

Maybe I should have taken another look at my pastor's glasses...

I'm all for satire, but for future reference, I would like to see an intellectually response to his article (or other similary articles). Please look at his description of the Emergent church and explain where he is wrong. These were some pretty heavy accussations, but you created a joke. Why is his article false?

Chris,

I responded with absurdity because Pastore's article is absurd.

Pastore has no concept of what the "Emergent Church" actually is, because the Emergent Church doesn't have set theological values that determine if one is Emergent or not. It's not a denomination. What Pastore refers to as "Emergent" is just a knee-jerk response. If he'd ever spoken with folks like Brian McLaren, or if he'd ever done research into what Emergent Churches actually are, he would know that.

I don't think his article warrants an intellectual response. Pastore doesn't use Scripture to refute "Emergent" doctrine, he doesn't use verses to support his claims. He doesn't mention Christ once. Instead, he brings up "post-Christian Europe", "The United Nations" and the "ACLU" because he knows those words push buttons in Conservative minds ("ACLU? Yeah, those guys are bad! I don't like the Emergent Church!").

His concept of Christianity is so convoluted by his political beliefs that to intellectually debate would be like a college professor arguing with a 14 year-old.

Plus, I'm not that college professor, i'm just the clown trying to point out the absurdity of it all. I'm sure you'll find intellectual responses elsewhere, but I doubt any theological mind worth his salt (Emergent or otherwise) would take the time to respond to such tripe.

I don't think the TH article is even worth an intellectual response. (My jaw was on the floor the entire time I read it.) I personally wouldn't want to waste my energy on that. The humor was greatly appreciated after the schlock of Pastore's opinion and accusations.

Jordan-I laughed so hard that coffee came out of my nose (expect to hear from my lawyer).

Chris-I totally agree that it is important for people to understand what is meant with the phrase "Emergent Church" before we start praising or knocking it. There was an article in CT a while back by Scot McKnight that I thought was really helpful, you should check it out.
http://www.ctlibrary.com/40534

Jordan, you say that you will not respond to absurdity. Obama says in his first year he will meet with leaders that do nothing, but speak absurdity (Castro, Chavez and Ahmadinejad). GWB agrees with your approach when dealing with people. I believe we have first, you agree with GWB's foreign policy! (ok that was joke and I totally digressed).

I agree that it was a rather harsh analysis and over the top by Pastore. I disagree that these people reading this article are the "yes men" and "yes women" of the political right. The contributors of Townhall are people like William Bennett and Hugh Hewitt (Conservative and intellectual). Also, I'm not sure I would measure the "spirituality" of a piece by the amount of scripture that is noted.

I try to read BSW every week and post comments often. Your comment about his concept of Christianity being convoluted by his politics could be applied to many of the articles that I read. BSW and the Editors, specifically, go out of their way to prove their independence of conservative Christians by negativity. If the one thing that we have in common is Christ, it would be nice to hear something that brings us together.

Oh, Chris, I don't think we've ever run an article implicating the Evangelical Church in supporting world-wide terrorism.

My goal with this site isn't to bring Christians together until we find common ground. That would be a pretty boring magazine, and also impossible. No, one of our goals is to say, "This stance is supported by many Christians in the United States. Let's take some time to think about why our fellow believers feel this way. Is it because we're following Christ, or is it because we're following a nation or a leader or an ideology outside of Christ? Could some believers believe the exact opposite and still be standing on Biblical principles?"

Also, I know we run a lot of articles that don't quote Scripture, but Pastore was attacking a theological phenomenon with a political argument. That's what was so absurd.

You say it is impossible to bring Christians together and I agree with you, but you arrogance towards evangelicals is apparant in the articles. See also "Funny Stories"

Again, a response to Pastore's article would have been more interesting than the satire piece. Does the Emergent Church or BSW believe that Christ's Church is a mission or an institution or both? Do you believe a people group, such as the Emergent Church, can influence a society in such a way that it would rather appeace terrorist. You response to those types of questions would have made a better piece...in my opinion.

chris...still not sure why you read BWC. there's probably a web magazine out there that would be more suited to you and you wouldn't have to express your displeasure so frequently.

as for the arrogance in "Funny Stories", I didn't author that piece, but I can understand the frustration of the writer, a full-time missionary who's daily life is often negatively impacted by American culture.

(And yes, I know American culture has done some amazing things for humanity, but that doesn't make it all good.)

here's the thing, chris: you are so engrossed and identified by conservative culture that your email address reflects your political party. When your email address has the initials "GOP" in it, it might be time to wonder if you're thinking objectively about political issues, or if you're thinking objectively about your fellow believers who may question some of your beliefs.

You are probably right. Good luck to you. Fear Groupthink!

I'm confused. Are there two people named Chris who have commented or just one?

Oh and worse, when dealing with issues like "health care" and "the poor", they cite the Canadians use of Socialism as a possible solution. Canada, with their "anti capital punishment" stance. And their decision not to send their military into Iraq and follow the UN's rulings. And they have gun control. If we're not careful, we might end up like them.

Hilarious, Jordan. Don't mind people who just don't get it.

Also, you, me and Brian McLaren need to be debriefed by Osama very soon. It's very difficult to schedule meetings with him these days.

I have lived in the LA area most of my life and know KKLA Christian radio station. I can stomach it in the morning, if it's Alisdair Baig or the lovely, endearing J Vernon McGee. But occasionally I turn on too late, after Minirth Myer and Hank Hannagraff have already signed off, and it's three full hours of Frank "The Bloviator" Pastore exhaling his self-important hate speech.

I have always tried to maintain an open mind about people with opposing viewpoints. but more often than not, I have to shut the man off, because he makes me angry. Why? I don't mind a good debate. Take Dennis Prager, who is able to argue his point without insulting his guest. Pastore, on the other hand, makes a point of being vituperative, mean-spirited, judgmental, and worse: he insults and demeans those who oppose him. A good sign of an egomaniac. I'm not the only one. Countless of my Christian friends despise him. Friends are over-35, evangelical, and non-emergent.

Pastore should look at his own life for examples of what strain of Christians are aiding and abetting Al-Quaeda. Those who attack each other.

Journalists argue that American presence in Iraq was going well until February 22, 2006. Al Quaeda bombed the shiite al-Askari Mosque in Samarra. For the sole purpose of inciting Shiites against Sunnis. And it worked spectacularly well. Iraq is poised for a civil war. Al-Qaeda's philosophy: divide the opposition to destroy each other.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Askari_Mosque_bombing_(2006)

This seems to be Pastore's M.O. Attack the emergent church, accuse them of destroying the Great American Christian faith. He uses big six dollar words, incendiary speech that his fans want to hear (just read the comments on townhall and you'll see, the sunni-shiite like dirty bombs going back and forth on the comments page. By both Pastore lovers and haters.

This is disgusting.

I am "emergent-friendly." I like a lot of what Brian McLaren says, and other things annoy me. For example, my husband and I have been reading "the Secret Message of Jesus." McLaren says that "the kingdom of God is not about going to heaven when you die ... The kingdom of God is about bringing God's revolution here and now." Well Bri, if there is no 'heaven' after death, then all those people who are being slaughtered in Darfur, the children who die of AIDS or gang violence are up shit creek without a paddle. There better darn well be a heaven after we die, or God has no business promising that he is going to achieve justice for the oppressed. For a good 2/3 of the world, the afterlife is their ONLY hope, because those of us living large in first World taking too long to bring that 'kingdom of God now." My husband assures me Mclaren doesn't mean there ISN'T a heaven after you die, he just means that's not the ONLY thing. Well then McLaren should qualify his statement when he writes it. Or at least, soon after. I lose respect for the writer when he leaves out huge chunks of canon theology. Now I AM going to read through the rest of the book to see what else he says. Because I like the guy.

I did like his New Kind of Christian trilogy. Things he said did annoy me, but hey he's just a guy. He's not the Pope. But from what I've of McLaren, and what I've heard about people who met him, he doesn't pretend to be. He's a genuinely NICE guy. He admits he's trying to stir things up, he doesn't proclaim himself the King of All Christian media. His head seems to be in proportion to the rest of his torso.

Pastore, on the other hand, has a head the size of the Hindenburg. He's the most al-queda friendly asshole on the radio today. And I say that as a person who has lived in the So Cal area for many years, and had many misfortunes to dial past KKLA and catch him spewing mostly about politics: not about Jesus and what Jesus said and did. Once I caught him ripping Jane Fonda a new anus because of her liberal political views. Last time I checked, when someone like Fonda becomes a Christian, which she has, I think the point is to encourage them, not give them all sorts of reasons to hate other Christians and drive her away. Like we did with Bob Dylan.

Keep it up, Pastore. If you keep inciting Christians to hate each other, the more you divide the body of Christ. And then INDEED the terrorists have won.

Wait, does this mean that we're through with mean and divisive loaded questions from people? (yes, I see the irony in what I just wrote)

Susan, well said. Very well said. I dont know Pastore well, but he sounds an awful lot like Bill O'reilly. Or most people on Fox.

Brilliant article. I logged in to the bwc when I heard about Frank's rant to see if you responded.

You did not disappoint.

I read and man I love it.

"some quick ways to identify your enemies..."

wow, i had no idea... I'm an evangel-mergent-islamo-facist (minus the glasses)!

The truth hurts, TJ. The truth hurts.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to listen to a homemade mix with all of U2's most Christian songs, including:

- "City of Blinding Lights"
- "Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For"
- "40"
- "Yahweh"

But does not include:
- "The First Time" (because Bono throws away the key)
- "Mysterious Ways" (because God is referred to as a woman)
- "Mofo"

Just realized, Brian McLaren's initials are BMcL. Mc is just irish for son of. So if you remove the Mc, you get B.L. Bin Mc Laden. Son of Bin Laden. Shoulda known.

Then again, Frank Pastore's are FP. Fischer Price? F'ing Pansy? Fascist Pope? You decide.

I thought he had one good point in the original article, well worth talking about in late nights at a coffee shop: the tendency (not rule) native to the Emergent movement to avoid seminaries and traditional discipline.

Of course, the context made even that rather ridiculous.

On the bright side, many of last century's best Christian thinkers and writers came from England, whose "Daily Mail" has been writing this type of claptrap for well over 100 years.

The dangerous idiots we will have with us always. Fortunately, God always gives us satirists to preserve our sanity.

reading through the comments over at that site gave me a migrane... a bunch of adults behaving like juveniles and each claiming its due to the other side's lack of intelligence.

seesh. if only they realized there's no such thing as intelligence. it doesn't exist and neither do they. except in my mind to serve my internal play. i need to hire better actors.

I love this site! I come here on a regular basis to visit my brothers and sisters in cyberspace. This article was an appropriate and hilarious response to a guy who needs to put down his megaphone.

I love my church and community and am available to both on a full time basis. I am up to my eyes in pro-war, GOP equals Christianity, GO TEAM AMERICA ideology. Thank you for being an oasis.

I live in a small town in mid-Ohio and God has called me to STAY (this is missional!). By the grace of God, I am embraced by my church and community. I am allowed to do ministry here. I am different. My husband and daughter are different. We continue to be us and try to live Jesus is this odd place. I am outspoken, but try to be gentle because the people I live with are not arrogant, they were taught only one way. They usually give us grace and we try to give it back. This site lets me know there are people like me in the world who swear and drink beer and love to write and are human...The same people who love Jesus and others like crazy. Thanks. You keep me from going off on the people I love.

Jordan, you run an obscenely good magazine.
(I thought this was a good place to leave this post. The article left me feeling warm and fuzzy.)

BSW and the Editors, specifically, go out of their way to prove their independence of conservative Christians by negativity. If the one thing that we have in common is Christ, it would be nice to hear something that brings us together.

I agree with Chris, here, to some degree. I mean, I can't say if "BSW and the editors" routinely go out of their way. But I am of the opinion this article did. It didn't make me laugh, it made me discouraged. I kept reading, hoping for a break from the sarcasm and for the author to address the serious grievances in an intellectual manner.

I'm not trying to attack you, Jordan. Please don't hear that. Just providing feedback.

My first reaction to reading Pastore's article was to get REALLY ANGRY. I started reading the comments and then I realized that people were bashing and insulting and not being very Jesus like. On either side. (I first saw the article on the burnside blog - before reading this one)

I'm honestly a little sad at the response to Chris's questions (the other Chris).

I came at it with this approach: Did Jesus just insult or make fun of the Roman Empire? Eh, not really. However, the early Christians took Roman words and phrases and "hijacked" them for Christ. Eklesia (church), some verses, and "the good news" are 'parodies' on Roman culture.

People related to these words, and then the meanings became different over time.

So I also agree that brushing people like Pastore off isn't exactly in the spirit of our Rabbi. Fear and Judgement are Pastore's defense mechanisms. This guy has been educated a lot. He's bull-headed. Like Saul. Our defense mechanisms are cynicism and sarcasm. Maybe we're a little more fool-hardy to chop an ear off. We have to be careful not to despise people. If we live by the sword, we'll die by it.

I wrote a sincere reply to Pastore on my blog.

Just a gentle response. I still thought the article was brilliant.

I feel bad for H.E. Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa. That was a cheap shot.

People who use the word "metanarrative" intimidate me.

omg, nooma videos?? I KNEW IT!!

*brandishes "4 laws booklet" and charges off into the sunset*

Chris, I agree that sometimes we need to respond to criticism for the sake of the audience rather than the merit of of the critique, but if there is one thing I have learned in life, it is that I can either teach people what I believe in context, or be sidetracked into responding to criticism. It is a matter of which audience we will choose to focus on. Mostly, the audiences have either, 1. Chosen their Authority on the matter by association, or, 2. They are wider read than to just take an off the wall article like that seriously.

Read and discover from a wide source, teach to a focus audience! And if they are not your audience call them snakes and vipers like Jesus did. (Not very seriously engaging)

I sent this as an email to Pastore... not that I think he'll actually open his clenched up heart to read it... but you never know:

I belong to a church that probably falls under the "emergent church" label. And it strikes me that you must have very little experience with the emergent church to describe it as you do.

We very much believe the Bible is the true word of God. We very much believe in truth and lies, good and evil. We're not ashamed to stand up for the word of God, and we don't make excuses for uncomfortable truth just to keep things "conversational."

In fact, it's because we believe so strongly in the Word of God that we can see how far the institutional church has fallen from where God intended His church to be.

Beyond that, we read the constant Biblical talk of helping the poor and needy, talk of peace, talk of caring and loving people as Christ sees them--and with the weight God gave care for the poor in Biblical text, we believe that social justice is important to Him. God didn't call us to use the government to solve for these issues, but instead called us to outpour love, give of ourselves and our own resources, and work hard to help the poor and needy.

In fact, God didn't call Christians to use the government for anything. Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and then move on with your work for God. Jesus himself set that example.

I would put to you that it is the institutional church, which acts more like a corporate business than a spiritual entity... which encourages the "Sunday morning" religious Christian who puts in more time at the polls than at the soup kitchen... which encourages judgment and hatred despite the many and varied warnings against this through the Bible... which cares more about theology than unity, rightness than truth, and growth of numbers than spiritual growth...

It is the institutional church that has fallen victim to a relativistic truth. It is the institutional church that ignores the plight of the poor and the cause of love, and instead focuses on political power, judgment, warfare, and hate -- all things that Jesus spoke out against over and over and over...

Bending truth to suit your purposes and political goals... isn't that what you are accusing the emergent church of? The fact that ever increasing numbers of believers are starting to see a disconnect between what is written in the Bible and what they see in their church building does not make the emergent church weak. We stand strong in love--and there is nothing more powerful or beautiful than that.

Hey Jordan, I'm sorry I didn't read this 'till now...this is too funny. I blogged about something very similar today...but it's nowhere near as funny as this. I appreciate your setting up the safe houses for us!

Kristi (from Mid-Ohio)
I have recently moved from Jackson Hole, WY. to Mid-Ohio and your post renewed my hopes of finding a friend.

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, we may need to approve you before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear.