The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver

“Tata Jesus is Bängala” is a phrase that embodies the cultural tensions found in the thought-provoking novel, The Poisonwood Bible, by Barbara Kingsolver. The novel, a story of a missionary family in Africa, deals with culture clashes, missionary faux pas, and African history. And although Kingsolver herself is not a Christian, she delves into a misconception of Christianity through exploring the culture and tradition of its heritage in the western world.
The novel begins in flashback, with the mother, Orleanna Price’s foreshadowing thoughts as she tries to reconcile the past by piecing it together in the present. The family moves into a distant and small African village situated near the border between the modern day Congo and Zaire. The novel, divided into seven sections all named after books from the Bible and the Apocrypha, travels from view-point to view-point, each chapter written by a different female of the family. The father of the family, Nathan Price, and the other characters in the African village and beyond are all seen through the lens of these young Georgia girls and their mother as they grow and change in the African landscape. Kingsolver’s description of the emotional upheaval in the family is coupled with extensive insight into the flora and fauna of Africa. The physical becomes a canvas for communicating emotions suppressed by the family patriarch and their own cultural norms suppressed by their new environment.
The rise of war and the power struggle between the white man and the African is depicted on small and large scale. Nathan Price, an extremely controlling man, practically occupies his family, imposing on them his ideas about life. Eventually he becomes so overwhelmingly unreasonable and crazy that his family, forced to wake up from their nightmarish life in order to survive in Africa, must leave him. Each female finds her own way to cope with the baggage they carry. Africa, also occupied by the white man, realizes its inner turmoil will only resolve under the emergence of freedom. The end result for both family and country is a constant struggle to overcome their past while still fighting for a future.
In the middle of all the chaos, Kingsolver ties these revelations back to the Bible with her liberal use of biblical imagery. The Price family, sent as missionaries who are eventually cut off from their source, are constantly questioning a God that becomes culturally charged against the backdrop of unfamiliar territory. The encircling perspectives each girl forms travels round and round as their American mannerisms slowly fade into the reality of the surroundings in which they live. None of the family females stay in the small African village in which they began, but Africa remains inside each of them; the answers they once had are replaced now only with questions and doubts.
The title The Poisonwood Bible references Nathan Price’s constant mispronunciation of the word Bängala. His frequent use of the phrase “Tata Jesus is Bängala,” or poisonwood, is juxtaposed with its intended “Tata Jesus is Bangala”—precious or dear one. Is Kingsolver’s title revealing an underlying criticism of Christianity? One idea she does present is a new definition or view of the Bible; her novel itself becomes a sort of Bible of memoirs for the family, each person interpreting life in their own way. Kingsolver confirms reality to be the bible to which she ascribes, since real life is preferred to the twisted translations of the actual Bible.
Kingsolver’s seemingly subtle commentary on Christianity is heavily embedded in all the themes of the novel. The plot holds five females in the forefront, all naively captivated by their Christian heritage, but then twists into an all around rejection of their faiths. The white man, the guardian of this westernized religion shows himself to be overly possessive and controlling for psychological reasons of his own, which explain, but by no means excuse, his actions. When country and family eventually reclaim control over their own lives, they both reject the white man and his religion since it was the premise for the occupation from the beginning. In many ways Kingsolver’s novel seems to be a response to the famous Rudyard Kipling poem, “The White Man’s Burden,” as the work describes imperialism at its supposedly finest hour.
Are we then to conclude, due to Kingsolver’s very real and expressive critique, that Christianity is only a white man’s excuse for the power and occupation of an allegedly weaker vessel? No, I think a more annotated approach to Kingsolver’s interpretation exposes a different conclusion. Kingsolver’s presentation of Christianity as a mere cultural and heritaged idea with little substance except tradition would lead anyone to reject such tomfoolery. Her definition of Christianity discloses itself to be solely a cultural one that brings only oppression and destruction, itself becoming mere crazy-talk. This characterization of Christianity omits its true underlying message, replacing it with the failures and lies found in one human society. This Christianity holds not the redemption, truth and grace that true Christianity does. In a world where even supposed Christians are rejecting traditional westernized Christianity, calling themselves “Followers of Christ” and the like to differentiate, Kingsolver’s critique is well-timed. Her gentle reminder exhibits only the cultural icon of Jesus in his westernized get-up called tradition, someone we can call Bängala or poisonwood, not the true redemptive Jesus who is in reality Bangala, precious and dear.

Posted on January 14, 2008 12:00 AM



Comments
I think the most important facet of this story to remember is that she is not speaking of your faith - she is speaking to the dastardly emphasis that much of Christian missionary work did in rarely understanding the culture to which they were entering.
The ugly American/Imperialistic ideal that their culture was "christian" and was part of the "good news" - that is truly the poisonwood.
Separating that ugly form of religion and speaking against it is crucial to truly understanding what the good news looks like for another culture.
I think this should be mandatory reading for anyone considering cross-cultural missional living.
Posted by: Heidi Renee | January 14, 2008 7:37 AM
I read this book a few years ago and absolutely loved it. I found it very insightful. I have lived in West Africa as a missionary, but I have also worked with different NGO's and anthropologists. This sheds a lot of light on how non-missionaries living and working in Africa see missionaries. It is sad and unfair, but it is often the prejudgment missionaries face, especially in the academic world.
My constant struggle is wanting to show and justify what I am doing as a missionary to my critics, mainly humanitarian aid workers and academics. Sometimes I just have to get over it and realize that not everyone is going to like me and what I do and focus on my mission and purpose.
Posted by: Rebecca Lorena | January 17, 2008 8:21 AM
In response to Heidi, I agree, and I think Kingsolver is not talking about our idea of Christianity. I wanted to clarify that and to present the value the book has as an outsiders view of Christianity, and see how well she covered what she knew it to be.
And I agree 100% that all persons considering missions, especially global missions should read this book.
Posted by: e.m.knicely | January 17, 2008 3:11 PM
I read The Poisonwood Bible a couple years ago, and I thought it was exceptional. Thank you for reminding me to read it again.
I'm not sure it's relevant, however, to present this book as an "outsider's view of Christianity." If you are referring to Kingsolver as the outsider, or even the African villagers who encountered Nathan Price and his misguided determination, what they're viewing is Christianity gone wrong. Kingsolver focuses on one missionary who went to Africa with the wrong motivations (trying to overcome his past failures) and a tragic lack of cultural understanding. I think Christians would (and should) view Nathan Price with dismay equal to the portrayal Kingsolver provides.
I'm not sure the fact that her characters are Christian, while she apparently is not, has any real bearing on the presentation of the narrative. Would a Christian, starting with the same premise, have written this story any differently?
I do wish your review would have focused a little more on the 4 daughters in the Price family. The girls are not only the most interesting characters (who doesn't enjoy Adah's entries?), but they also serve as tragic examples of how people respond to (and are scarred by) misguided and destructive "Christians" like Nathan Price.
I disagree with your assessment that "[Kingsolver's] definition of Christianity discloses itself to be solely a cultural one that brings only oppression and destruction, itself becoming mere crazy-talk." Maybe that's her definition for Nathan Price's Christianity, but I don't think she ever intends for his beliefs to represent Christianity as a whole.
You say "Kingsolver confirms reality to be the bible to which she ascribes" and "Kingsolver's seemingly subtle commentary on Christianity is heavily embedded in all the themes of the novel." Are you referring to another source with these statements? An interview with Kingsolver? An essay? I don't understand how her fictional characters could have revealed that reality is the Bible to which the author "ascribes." Nor do I see proof that she is weaving a subtle commentary on Christianity into her story.
I do agree that Kingsolver's book is a "very real and expressive critique," but I think it is inaccurate to ascribe that criticism to anything more than the kind of "Christianity" demonstrated by Nathan Price.
Posted by: tyler Charles | March 4, 2008 9:28 AM
I would say that not just persons considering missions but all thinking Christians should read this book...not only for the predispositions that Christian missionaries face going overseas, but also to understand that incidents like the one fictionalized in Kingsolver's book are part of our collective history--there have been many "Nathan Price"'s in the mission field before now. And while I certainly understand the desire to distance ourselves from "that" kind of narrow, Westernized, and imperialist faith, I'm not entirely convinced that her portrayal of it is solely cultural.
Yes, the story that she tells is heartbreaking, but I think it is one that modern Christians must own up to.
Posted by: Heidi Strate | March 30, 2008 2:49 PM