Burnside Writers Collective
..
...
...
..
Secondary menu
.. Collective Home .. Store
Support BWC
 

Dogs and Bluejays

Chris Wellman
golden_retriever_250x251.jpg

Last week, baby blue jays were in the yard at my apartment. Three, I think. Too young to fly, they hopped along the ground and cried for food, which their mother regurgitated for them after swooping down from the trees. In the backyard is a fenced area where the first-floor tenants let their two dogs out a few times a day. I expected the baby birds to hop into the fenced area at times, and wondered if I should warn the dog owners. But would they care? Who am I to tell them what to do with their dogs? Who cares about a couple of baby birds anyway? Besides, blue jays are bullies.

Beautiful bullies, I argued to myself. I didn’t say anything. On another evening I came home from work, entered my apartment, and soon heard a dog barking. Looking out my back window I saw one of the dogs from the first floor barking at a baby blue jay, which was trying to hide in the ivy at the back corner of the yard. There is a solid brick wall at the back and sides of the property, so the bird was trapped. The dog was alternately sniffing at the bird and then recoiling when the bird jumped. After a short while the woman who owns the dogs came out and called for them. The dog that was after the bird initially came to her but then ran back to the bird. She called the dog again, and again, and again. But the dog didn’t listen and was becoming more aggressive. I wanted her to run across the ten feet it would take her to get to the dog and pull it away. But she just repeated the dog’s name in the same tone of voice, with no result. Perhaps she didn’t see the bird. Or perhaps she didn’t care. While she called, it looked like the dog may have stepped on the bird, and may have bitten it briefly—and that could be enough.

She finally walked (slowly) to the dog and pulled it away, the baby bird sitting right where its feet were. She made a groan upon seeing the bird, as if that were the first she knew of it. After she had gone inside, I saw the baby bird move slightly, lying in the ivy, no longer trying to get away. I shook my head, assumed the bird was dying, and started to make dinner.

And I was mad. I was mad at the woman for having a horribly disobedient dog. I was mad at the dog for its senseless act of violence, killing a vulnerable creature that it did not need to eat. And I wondered if I should be mad at myself for not telling the woman about the birds.

Then I remembered some thoughts I had a while back about pets. I wondered where the culture of having pets came from. The practice of keeping a domesticated animal in one’s house merely for—what? amusement? companionship?—seems to have a relatively short history. In the Bible, people kept animals for farming, food, transportation, and sacrifice. They always had a functional purpose, in other words; they were never just for fun, or for a friend. Certainly God makes clear in Genesis that animals are not suitable companions for those of us made in His image. If they were, women would not exist. Ahem.

So, what changed? How did the practice of keeping useless animals in our homes become the norm in our day? Why do we purchase animals that have no practical benefit to the functioning of our lives? Well, why not? It’s just to add some more spice to life, more entertainment, a sense of the exotic. Or, to help chase away that dreadful silence, perhaps to soften the blows of loneliness. It seems that most of the reasons I can think of, or have heard, are inconsistent with a relationship with God. Why would Jesus want me to have a dog?—especially given the time and money spent for the pet’s care over the course of its life. Shouldn’t this be spent on people?

But we can also ask the question from the perspective of the natural world. Where did domesticated dogs and cats come from? Special breeding, in many cases—breeding that often results in animals that are ridiculously unfit for survival in the wild. Imagine a poodle trying to make it in the outback. If an animal can’t flourish in nature, and take its place in a functioning ecosystem, what is it? Have we created a breed of creatures best suited for life in a human household, eating only the food we place in front of them?

And they affect nature. I’ve been to several talks and conferences in the past year dealing with environmental sensitivity. Whenever the topic of our embarrassingly polluted waterways has been discussed, pet waste has been named as a primary culprit. Of course there’s lawn fertilizer and motor oil and lead from brake linings, but I think I’ve heard pet waste mentioned most frequently. This had never occurred to me. Poop? Isn’t that natural? Wouldn’t that be good for nature? No, apparently the volume of waste making its way to streams has created a significant bacteria problem. This is where our tap water comes from. Sure, if everyone picked up after their pets every time, this wouldn’t be a problem. But that won’t happen.

And, pets still have a residual instinct to kill—though they have no need to. I grew up with cats; the ones that weren’t too lazy were always trying to kill something, a mole, lizard, baby squirrel, baby bird. Surely this is a lesser problem than bacteria in our waterways. But my recent experience seeing a domestic dog attack a wild bird became a symbol for me of the relationship between all the pets in the world and all of wild nature. The two cannot be friends. Pets are hostile to nature.

Of course you can make a “pet” out of an animal that flourishes in the wild. I did. I grew up with both cats and parakeets. The last bird I had died last August after eleven years. I was very sad—over a parakeet?? Oh, but what a cool bird he was! So tame and affectionate and fun, and funny. I bought him before I started dating the girl I would marry, and he died a month after our divorce. The bird outlived an entire human relationship. I buried him in the back corner of the backyard here, where the baby blue jay was. But my parakeet’s ancestry is in Australia, where he would have flown in great flocks, dodged hawks, eaten all kinds of berries and nuts and leaves, mated and raised baby parakeets. But instead he was caged in the US, fed seeds every day, and seldom met another parakeet. Oh sure, we let him fly around the house all the time. He didn’t seem to know what he was missing. And he fell in love with his reflection, more than any other bird I’ve had. He tried to mate with mirrors, and with people’s faces. I wonder if he had gone insane—a flock animal made to live alone with humans. We are not suitable companions.

I wonder if one of the deeper reasons we like living with domesticated animals is that it simulates a characteristic of Eden, and the New Earth. Once, there was no fear between man and animals, and in an eternity yet to begin, “the lion shall lie down with the lamb, and a little child shall lead them.” But ever since Noah—if i recall correctly—animals have been instinctively fearful of humans. And why not—given the havoc we wrought. Lately I’ve liked to use the word “enchanting” to describe moments when this and other enmities of our fallen world seem to be briefly suspended. A Carolina wren flew into a room of my apartment once through an open window, sat on the handlebars of my bike, and sang his song, as if to test the room’s acoustics. He was not bewildered, like all other wild birds I’ve seen trapped indoors. He flew in on purpose, exploring, curious, and then flew out at will, alighting momentarily on the windowsill to sing once more. That was an enchanting way to begin my day of work—an ancient and future harmony, which my soul remembers and longs for, made an appearance in my apartment. It was a symbol, not the reality—the wren never lost its fear of me, it just didn’t know I was there, peaking through a doorway. But the symbol is divine, a blessing, a prophecy; if we interpret it correctly it can lead us to worship.

Perhaps enchantment, however, cannot be forced without dire consequences—both for the natural world and for our spirits. Trapping or breeding animals to live with us is not an attempt to create a symbol of lost harmony, but to remake Eden here and now. Subconsciously we know something is missing, so we try to fix it by our own hand, ignoring the fact that this universe does not sustain our imposed order. I feel this temptation as an architect. I want to make Edenic places—walled gardens, pristine and perfect and clean, and crystalline glass boxes. But when I see places like this they make me hurt, because they remind me of what is lost without telling me what to do about it. I couldn’t live there; it’s untrue. It’s kitsch. It’s a Thomas Kinkaid painting. Indeed a place should give us glimpses of Eden through intense beauty, but it also must open to the world and deal with its ugliness.

I had almost turned on the stove to cook dinner when I heard a knock at my door. I opened it and the woman who owned the dogs was standing there. She said she had a strange question for me, and told me about the baby bird, asking what to do about it. I asked how badly it was hurt, thinking it was nearly dead. She didn’t know, and was palpably relieved when I said I’d come down to take a look. She had walked the two flights of steps to my third floor apartment about the baby bird, and on the way down spoke to me in somewhat desperate tones that she didn’t know what her dog was after until he had already gotten to it—as if defending herself against my unspoken suspicions. I knew then that she cared. I walked to the bird and took it into my hands, cringing as I expected to see crushed legs, broken wings, mortal wounds all over. But instead the bird pushed with two surprisingly strong legs and nearly broke my grasp. I held a little tighter, spread each wing, scanned the back and belly, and saw no scratch nor missing feather.

The last time I held a blue jay in my hands, it was an adult gasping for breath, dying. I had shot it with a pellet gun, in my teens—a nasty habit I now see as another horribly misplaced attempt to bring animals close. Rarely, if ever, had a bird I shot died in my hands, and none so handsome. At that time I remember this thought shooting through my head, probably not from my head: His colors will never again be as bright as they are right now.

I assured the woman that the baby seemed fine, and quite lucky to be. I stretched my arms over the brick wall and dropped the squirming bird into a yard without dogs. It hopped several feet away from us, and sat still. I went back upstairs, started dinner, and looked out the window. The woman was still standing at the wall, looking at the baby, then up at the trees, then checking her cell phone. I debated whether to say anything, but didn’t hesitate long. I told her from the window that she should go inside, because the mother would not come to the baby while she was standing there. She agreed, and left.

End

Posted on September 10, 2007 12:00 AM
HR

Comments

Confession time: I saw a little dog on the road dead this morning. I thought about the peole who owned it and were probably worried about where their poor dog was. I wondered if I should try to find out who owned it, or at least see if there was any hope for it. I kept driving, but felt pretty crummy for the rest of the day. It's weird how disturbing this was, and it made me think how animals can evoke such strong emotion. A great article.

People's attachment to non-working dogs as pets is pretty simple when you have them around. They may be neurotic or hyper, but they are so simple, direct, and unaffected. Somehow they toggle the same reactions we have to babies and toddlers. And, where kids are going to start pushing you away as they develop, dogs always will always be happy to see you and want you around. And they don't judge you for being too old or too fat or too ugly or too boring-- it's refreshing.

On the topic of predation, this attachment gives dog owners a pretty big blindspot . We tell ourselves that the dog "wouldn't know what to do" if he caught that [fill in the blank]. It's delusional, and I've met a lot of horrified owners who found out otherwise, but it's part of the attachment. Don't judge us too harshly.

lovely article; I think you've articulated it well as "an ancient and future harmony, which my soul remembers and longs for." We want to connect to nature: know it, befriend it, love it, and bring it into our world, even if they only understand a fraction of how much we know, or love them. And that's a bit like the way God loves us. I love my cat, my husband has come to love my cat. She's silly and fun, full of surprises, and doesn't grasp the totality of our love for her.

My parents had two fox terriers, Molly and Patrick. My father passed away when the dogs were 10. Six years later Patrick died. My brother and I live in different cities, but we emailed each other a week after Patrick died, and discovered we'd had similar 'images' come up while in prayer: Dad playing ball with Patrick, on some grassy spot in heaven." That's the ancient and future harmony you mention.

Really wonderful piece, thanks Chris!

I have been entertaining the same ideas for at least a year now. Thank you for connecting these thoughts with the spirital.

I adore animals, but in their natural states, and I do not believe that dependancy on human beings is a natural state. It especially saddening to me that breeding can produce such dependant creatures. I feel sorry for the animals (especailly dogs) who are kept in yards and homes and *gasp* appartments.

By the way, if I'm not mistaken, dogs were initially domesticated as a food source by our ancesors. Food for thought anyway.

I've had similar thoughts, too. It is weird to have these little animals in our houses. But on the other hand, we've gone and bred them so now unless we want to propose euthanizing all of them or turning them out into "the wild," we're stuck with them, which is okay with me and probably most other people, too. =]

RE: Alex's remark.
I thought men domesticated dogs so they would have someone of similar table manners to enjoy their meals with.

Well of course that was the first reason, until the men got jealous of the beasts manners, and a little hungry on a cold night.

Re Melinda:

And that is the sadest part of it. We have made it necessary to keep them as pets because we have humiliated them as a species. We even have them "fixed" to avoid those inconvenient natural urges and processes.

I love animals, but I think this is offensive in the face of God's creation. To take something that is natural, a preditory pack animal, and deprive it not only of it's pack, but it's natural environment is a little bit heretical for people who would be claiming to love what God has made. If we love creation so much why must we alter it?

I've noticed too that wild dogs such as Cyotes and Fox are couted as more of a pest than a natural inhabitant of an area, especially where dogs and cats are kept. A cyote can't help it if a cat represents prey. A deer eats the foliage, it's what it does. Raccoon are a foraging animal, if there is food outside, it will come. Are they really pests?

I would love it if there were some way of restoring dignity to the species without entertaining euthenasia or "fixing," but I don't have an answer.

"Certainly God makes clear in Genesis that animals are not suitable companions for those of us made in His image. If they were, women would not exist. Ahem."

Ballsy. Unadvised, but ballsy.

Recently my dog Charlie (male Pekingnese) got out of my parents yard during a thunderstorm. He was scared, and we are still trying to find him. We have done everything we know to do: flyers, ads in the paper, notifying vets and groomers. Me and my husband got Charlie when he was a puppy as a wedding present three years ago. I know its silly but in some ways I feel like I have lost a child or a very close friend. Every time I would look at his little squished up face it would make me smile or laugh. He brought us so much joy. I believe Charlie was happy too. We took him to my parents every day while we were at work so he could play in thier backyard with thier Pekingnese Ce Ce. We played with him everyday after work and took him on a walk with us. We even took him with us camping on our wedding anniversary. Charlie was the dog I had always dreamed of having as a child. He played fetch, slept at the foot of the bed, and followed me around wherever I went just because he wanted to be with me. I know Pekingnese is a really old breed, but it is comical for me to think of a pack of Pekingneses running around in the wild. If you have seen a Pekingnese in person who know what I am talking about. I don't think it is wrong to domesticate animals if they can enjoy human company. I know Charlie wouldn't have it any other way.

If you see a stray dog please call your local animal shelter or animal rescue group. I see way too many animals dead on the side of the road. If you have taken in a stray dog or cat please check the animal detective websites. It could be somebody's pet!

We are still looking for Charlie. He was lost in Shawnee, Oklahoma on June 12th. He is a three year old male Pekingnese, white with light tan spots, He is extremely friendly. He did have a leather collar with rabies tags and our contact infomation. You can go to any pet detective website to contact us. He could be anywhere. Thanks

so glad the blue jay was okay! you know how i become attached to animals, unconditional love. i love my nieces and nephews to the greatest depths! my pets are my children and they are loved and treated justly.

I think a lot of our drive to bring pets into our home, which is, as you say, a ridiculous idea when you think about it, is a result of urbanization in recent centuries. We seem to have some sort of bond with nature, and when we divorce ourselves entirely, we miss it. Maybe, as you say, it's our attempt to restore that bond. I know I feel something's missing in those rare times of my life when I haven't had a pet.

I also discovered something with our newest pet, a shelter rescue puppy. In taking her to puppy class to save my shoes and garden from a slobbery death, I've discovered how important it is to communicate with her in terms she understands rather than punish her when she doesn't do what I say without thinking of why she didn't. It's a small thing, but it's teaching me to think more carefully about how I communicate with othr people rather than cram them into my idea of how the world has to work.

When I was in college, the administration actually brought in a couple of puppies for us to play with one evening. It was the best!! All these years later I still remember it. I know that some people bring their dogs to hospitals and nursing homes, too, and that it improves the mood of the people there, which in turn improves their over-all health. So, while I don't think we should run around buying thousand dollar diamond collars for our dogs or neglecting our human interactions for that of a pet, I do think that pets play an important and necessary role in the world.

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, we may need to approve you before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear.

Take time to visit