Burnside Writers Collective
..
...
...
..
Secondary menu
.. Collective Home .. Store
Support BWC
 

Global Food Security

Mark Petterson
rice.jpg

As my late Christmas gift to you, I present some things to consider this New Year, convenient and hackneyed, numbered 1 - 4. I hope it will - if nothing else - serve as a distraction if you, along with the rest of the West, wonder what will happen to jobs and bank accounts and car companies, and await a new administration promising something better. I believe something better is possible, but it will require a radical shift in ideology and priorities at the personal and political level. I am certainly no expert, but I’ll do my layman’s best to lay out some of what we should be considering in 2009.

1. The Global Food Crisis is nothing new.

The global food crisis has been going on for much longer than this transient financial ‘crisis,’ and is of much greater consequence, although few seem to care that much, if we count amount of news coverage as an indicator of our priorities. Thirty-seven countries, all of them of course in the developing world, are right now at massive risk of widespread famine. This is due to a number of factors, including world financial instability, natural disasters, and, most importantly, skyrocketing food prices, which restrict subsistence farmers from planting and prevent the extremely poor from purchasing the food that is available. UN Secretary-General Ban has termed this situation a “moral outrage,” albeit one which doesn’t garner nearly as many cable news headlines as, say, Detroit CEO’s choosing to fly commercial.

2. The financial crisis has just made things worse.

Oxfam reports that the Wall Street meltdown of 2008 has sent an additional 119 million people to live below the poverty line. Already nearly a billion people went undernourished in 2007, and now these negative developments threaten the very fabric of communities in Sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere as family units struggle to survive, already floundering under the burden of HIV/AIDS and malaria epidemics. Huge amounts of people are suffering, while most of the hideous details are hidden deep inside the newspaper, where few will find it - unless they’re looking.

3. It’s (at least partly) our fault.

Though I am leaving out a great deal of complexity in this simple pronouncement, it nonetheless goes without saying that the broader forces at work in these tragedies are more or less a direct result of the alleged ‘free market’ and American policies that place corporate cronies in very powerful places. Again, this is a simplification of a very complex situation - but is essentially true. Globalization and a short-sighted oil dependent policies have finally shown themselves to be disastrous. US agriculture corporations essentially run the world food system, and are, by design, concerned with feeding profits, rather than feeding the hungry. It has been this way for a very long time, and the domination of Western finance on local food economies in developing countries is close to being beyond dispute. Think I’m overstating the case? If you do a little research (start here) your inquiries will also be rewarded with thousands of horror stories: indigenous farmers pressured to produce cash crops or American farmers asked to destroy food to keep prices high. Things like corn ethanol are merely microcosms of an ideology gone awry. This is food wasted, while people literally starve to death.

4. The next administration will have the power to change things - with our help.

The UN estimates that $40 billion a year is needed over the next three to five years to right the sinking ship. Try as they might, charities like World Vision and Oxfam are simply not capable of raising this sort of money. But the government is. (See: $700 billion bailout.) Throwing money at a problem is usually not the solution. But it is certainly better than doing nothing, and while we can raise ungodly amounts of cash for Merril Lynch and Bank of America, certainly we can throw a little money to those who cannot afford a cup of rice. Wall Street and Main Street will be fine. What about the places where the streets have no name? Or where they have no streets at all?

Which brings us to forward motion, already put into action by Senators Lugar and Casey: The Global Food Security Act, S.3529. It is an update of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, and a forceful plan to “promote food security and…improve emergency response to food crises.” It includes the appointment of a Special Coordinator for Global Food Security, responsible directly to the President, as well as a board of advisors composed of members from NGOs and Universities. The ‘food czar’ will be the point person in coordinating NGO and government (both foreign and domestic) involvement into a comprehensive policy to prevent such catastrophes as we see occurring today. The only drawback is the paltry sum, $500 million, appropriated for such a panoramic cause. It is at least a step in the right direction, and one that will place global hunger squarely in the priorities of the President. Congress won’t consider it until next year, which is why we must get behind it now.

While we were reading the Times, the Eternities slipped by unnoticed. It is a humiliating shame, because those who run the West hold a negative birthright: the world owes us nothing. We owe the world everything.

Our middle-class existence is not an excuse for hubris, but rather a prerogative for altruism. Moved to act? Call your Congressperson. Send an email to the President-Elect, asking him to get behind the Global Food Security Act.
Support groups like Oxfam and the World Food Programme as they so headily and steadily attempt to right one of the grievous wrongs of our generation.


Sources:
Compassion
Washington Post
The Nation
http://www.friendsofwfp.org/site/pp.asp?c=7oIJLSOsGpF&b=4701003
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-3529

* * *

The Burnside Writers Collective fundraising campaign has begun. If you can donate a few bucks, we’d be grateful. Here are a few ways we want to say thank you:

Donations under $35: A Burnside sticker.

$35-$59: A copy of Donald Miller’s upcoming book A Million Miles in a Thousand Years and a Burnside sticker. The book is due out in 2009. We may or may not be able to get copies before they hit the stores. Regardless, you’ll get when we get it.

$60-$99: An autographed copy of A Million Miles in a Thousand Years, a book of your choice penned by one of our contributors* (list of options below) and a Burnside sticker.

$100-$199: An autographed copy of A Million Miles in a Thousand Years, two books penned by our contributors, a Burnside t-shirt and a Burnside sticker.

$200 or more: An autographed copy of A Million Miles in a Thousand Years, all five books penned by Burnside contributors, a Burnside t-shirt, a Burnside sticker and your name listed as a Burnside Patron on the new site.



End

Posted on January 5, 2009 9:33 AM
HR

Comments

Thanks for bringing about such a serious problem in our world today through your article.
The thing I would disagree with is how we as Christians should respond to such a crisis. Government is not the solution to our world's problems, so we should not put our hope in the next administration or any future administration. Our hope and trust must be in God. What does that mean? Well, let's say we give our money, time and resources to organizations like the World Food Programme or Oxfam...and maybe we save a few lives here on earth...but what about people's lives in eternity. Jesus didn't just meet physical needs but eternal needs as well. He healed and fed people, but he also preached a message of repentance, forgiveness and salvation. There are great Christian based organizations that feed those in poverty, provide clean water, provide healthcare to the sick AND share the wonderful life saving message of Jesus Christ. If we could bring life to people physically and eternally then that would be something.

Vince: I agree with you that we cannot ignore eternal needs in favor of the now, but I also believe that if we are prioritizing eternal concerns over the physical then we are missing the point. Jesus cared (and cares) for both. He always dealt with people in their circumstances on earth while inviting them to an eternal present AND future. Which I think is what you're getting at.

The only disagreement I have is this: if we ignore the power of structural solutions to structural problems then we deny our power as bringers of life and light. If we ignore the person in front of us in favor of structural solutions then we falter as well.

We MUST have BOTH to see people given the opportunity to live a life of freedom and grace.

Virtually all of the Bible is filled with warnings against NATIONS who sit by as injustice and violence consume the innocent.

I marvel that "Christians" can not only paralyzed in their self-absorbtion, but also thoroughly ignorant of the word (and the heart) of God when people are suffering.

Here is yet another example of how hard our hearts can be in the face of human desperation:http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/01/20091920212870205.html

Jesus was "known by his wounds" - how is it that his followers are known by our excuses for not caring?

Sigh...

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, we may need to approve you before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear.

Take time to visit