Burnside Writers Collective
..
...
...
..
Secondary menu
.. Collective Home .. Store
Support BWC
 

Peace Looks Like Jesus Christ

John Pattison
gaza3.jpg

Three weeks ago, on December 27, in response to continued mortar and rocket fire targeting Israeli settlements, Israel launched a massive air campaign against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. More than 220 Palestinians were reported killed in the first days of the offensive. Israeli ground forces entered Gaza a week later. They surrounded and then entered Gaza City, continuing to battle Hamas with infantry, tanks, and gunships. In the last two days, Israel and Hamas have announced temporary ceasefires, and Israeli forces are slowly withdrawing from Gaza. Before the ceasefire, however, the fighting was halted for only three hours each day to allow humanitarian aid to enter the city - a gesture Human Rights Watch called “woefully insufficient.” According to Agence-France Press, medics are taking advantage of the relative calm to comb areas which had been inaccessible. Yesterday they pulled at least 95 bodies from the rubble, including those of several children. The Palestinian death toll now stands at more than 1,300.

Reading the news from Gaza, I can’t help but despair. The majority of Palestinians want peace with Israel and would accept a two-state solution (the majority of Israelis have expressed support for the same plan), but Palestinian civilians are caught between two violent and powerful forces: an oppressive nationalism in the form of the Israeli military, the fourth largest in the world, and Islamic extremism as exemplified by the terrorist group Hamas. I think also, with some shame, of how a just and lasting peace in Israel-Palestine is complicated (if not totally compromised) by churches and para-church organizations in the U.S. which offer unwavering support to Israel while relieving Israel of any moral obligation to the occupied Palestinian people. David Brog, Executive Director for Christians United for Israel, the largest such para-church organization, wrote on January 12 that “Israel will continue to be blamed for all of the bloodshed that results from a conflict it tried so hard to avoid for so long. Standing with Israel in the coming weeks will be more important than ever. And this is what we will continue to do.”

To get a different perspective on the conflict than the one so prominent in American evangelical churches and mainstream media, I interviewed Sister Elaine Kelley, the administrative officer of Friends of Sabeel - North America (FOSNA), a Christian ecumenical organization seeking justice and peace in the Holy Land through non-violence and education. FOSNA, as the name suggests, also supports the vision of Sabeel, a grassroots liberation theology movement initiated by Palestinian Christians in the early nineties. Sabeel’s three stated goals are to promote theological, moral, and legal principles for peace as outlined in its Jersualem Sabeel Document; to develop a spirituality based on justice, peace, nonviolence, liberation and reconciliation; and to promote a more accurate awareness of the heritage and witness of Palestinian Christians. FOSNA, which is headquartered in Portland, Oregon, cultivates the support of American churches for Sabeel through regional educational conferences, alternative pilgrimages, witness trips, and international gatherings in the Holy Land.

Sister Elaine Kelley, SFCC, a Roman Catholic and member of the Sisters for Christian Community, has been involved in the Palestine-Israel peace movement since 1989 when she traveled to the Holy Land on pilgrimage. She lived in Bethlehem in the West Bank for four years, learning the Arabic language, becoming part of the local Palestinian Christian and Muslim communities, and witnessing life under Israel’s military occupation. She served as development officer at Bethlehem University from 1998-2000. For six years she was a writer for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs and is a contributor to the book, They Came and They Saw: Western Christian Experiences of the Holy Land. She has served as the organization’s Administrative Officer since August 2001.

BWC: What is FOSNA’s response to the current Israeli offensive in Gaza?

Official Sabeel statements about Gaza are posted at our website www.fosna.org. Briefly, we oppose all violence, whether it is Israel or Hamas, but work to educate people about the great disparity of power between Israel and the oppressed Palestinian population in Gaza. Our view is that Israel is in violation of international law, UN resolutions and human rights and bears the brunt of the responsibility because it is the fourth most powerful military in the world and has a long history of oppression of the Palestinian people.

BWC: What are you hearing, if anything, from the Christian community in Gaza about the humanitarian situation there?

Our board chair, The Rev. Richard Toll, has received communications from the Episcopal Church USA and the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem, detailing the tragic situation at the Episcopal Al Ahli Hospital in Gaza. Rev. Toll visited Gaza and the hospital last April (08) with Catholic Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of Detroit. This was during Israel’s blockade of Gaza (going on 15 months now), in which the entire population of Gaza was being punished for the actions of Hamas militants. The situation was dire in April—lack of medicines, food, water, electricity, and continued under Israel’s blockade, resulting in the current crisis.

BWC: What has been the response of the Palestinian Christian communities to the latest violence?

The Palestinian Christian community is a very small minority in the Holy Land (under 2% of the total population) and dwindling still—all because of the hardships associated with Israel’s occupation. The response has been the same for the past many decades. That we need a final political solution based on international law, existing United Nations resolutions which call for Israel to withdraw to 1967 borders and give Palestinians their independent state in the West Bank, Gaza, and with East Jerusalem as their capital. The Palestinian Christian community, working with European and American church leaders, has attempted to achieve this only workable political solution that would put an end to the conflict. But lack of political will, especially in the U.S., allowed the suffering to continue, allowed Israel to continue its illegal military occupation (now 41 years), basically allowed Israel to do whatever it wanted to achieve its goal of total domination in the region, and total control over the West Bank and Gaza. There are many historical statements and documentation of the words and work of the Palestinian Christian community at our website.

BWC: Your use of the phrase “final political solution” can’t help but conjure up the specter of the “final solution.” The association was obviously unintentional, but it is a reminder of how much Israel believes it has at stake. It is understandable - though not necessarily defensible - that Israel should react so strongly, given the long history of persecution and even genocide against the Jews and the blatant threats of some of its Arab neighbors. The slogan since the Holocaust has been “Never again.”

The Palestinian people did not take part in the Holocaust; they, too, are victims of it and continue to be victimized by a political Zionism which justifies any violence to defend a Jewish state. But to destroy the lives of Palestinians for the purpose of Israeli security, to subjugate another people who live in misery under a brutal military occupation is presumptive. Israel will only be able to defend its citizens if it addresses the causes of their insecurity—the 41 year-old occupation.

BWC: I think there are still some American evangelicals who might be surprised to read that there is a population of Arab Christians living in Israel-Palestine. Can you describe for us the Christian community there? Are these Arab Christians transplants from the West or has there been a continuous population of Christians in Israel-Palestine for some time?

The Christian community is a tiny minority (less than 2% of the total Palestinian and Israeli population). These are descendants of the original Christians of first-century Palestine (who “drank tea with the apostles,” as some proudly point out). Before the creation of the state of Israel, the Christian population was more like 20%. They are the most educated population in the entire Arab World and have been the “living stones” of the Holy Land—witnesses to Christianity from its beginnings and providing a living, worshiping Christian community for over 2,000 years.

BWC: Several years ago, Sabeel convened a conference in Jerusalem which called for the rejection of “Christian Zionism” as heresy and as an ideology of “empire, colonialism, and militarism.” (You covered the 2004 conference for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, and I’m quoting your article.) First of all, do you agree with Sabeel’s assessment of Christian Zionism as heresy? Secondly, is Christian Zionism, especially the Christian Zionism prevalent in many American churches, giving Israel the political cover it needs to conduct these raids into Gaza?

Christian Zionism is a modern theological heresy and political movement that embraces the most extreme ideological positions of Zionism, thereby becoming detrimental to a just peace within Palestine and Israel. Christian Zionism promotes a worldview where the Gospel is identified with the ideology of empire, colonialism, and militarism. In its extreme form, it places an emphasis on apocalyptic events leading to the end of history rather than living Christ’s love and justice today. Sabeel repudiates the more insidious form of Christian Zionism pervasive in the mainline churches that remains silent in the face of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Therefore, we categorically reject Christian Zionist doctrines as a false teaching that undermines the biblical message of love, mercy, and justice. The alliance of Christian Zionist organizations in the West with extremist elements in the governments of Israel and the United States are presently seeking to impose their unilateral preemptive strategies and militaristic rule.

BWC: How do Palestinian Christians view their brothers and sisters in the West?

Palestinian Christians make a clear distinction between western Christians and western governments that claim to be Christian (i.e. George Bush). While Palestinian Christians have extensive relationships with American and European Christians through Christian institutions long established in the Holy Land, they lament the profound ignorance, especially in the U.S., of the history and heritage Christians of the Holy Land, the stewards the Christian holy sites for over 2,000 years. Palestinians Christians, thanks to the work of Sabeel, are becoming more and more versed in a theological understanding of the political dimension of the Gospel, its clear message of preference for the poor and oppressed and its call to justice and peace. Through writings, such as Naim Ateek’s Justice & Only Justice and A Palestinian Christian Cry for Reconciliation, Palestinian Christians see the Gospel as relevant to their daily lives and the hardships imposed by military occupation. While liberation theology is seldom a subject for serious study by the privileged Christian of the West, it provides an important exegesis and much needed world view for the rich and powerful.

BWC: What do Palestinians wish American Christians knew about day-to-day life of Arab Christians in Israel-Palestine today?

Sabeel’s entire program and regional education conferences (in the U.S.) and witness trip/alternative pilgrimage is an effort directed at Christians in the West who need to “come and see” for themselves and learn about day-to-day life of Christians and Muslims under Israeli occupation. Thus, our alternative pilgrimages include visits to refugee camps, checkpoints, demolished houses, Jewish settlements, by-pass roads, bull-dozed olive groves, etc. Any human being with an active moral life will be transformed by this “seeing”. Our most dedicated volunteers are those who have participated in a Sabeel witness trip or other church-sponsored pilgrimage to witness the suffering of people under Israel’s occupation.

BWC: I read an article today in a conservative online magazine that Hamas has implemented Sharia law in Gaza and is even reinstating crucifixion for Christians? Does this report sound credible to you? How much freedom do Christians have in the Occupied Territories, including Gaza, to worship freely?

There are isolated incidents of persecution of Christians by Muslims, but these incidents get much attention from right-wing and conservative circles that are looking for reasons to discredit Islam and to put the blame for the problems of Arab Christians on Muslims. All during the time I lived in Palestine I saw predominantly a harmonious community. I lived in Beit Sahour, a town of about 20% Christian/80% Muslim. I worked at Bethlehem University, the only Catholic university in the Holy Land, which provides the only higher education available for the surrounding community and has a student body consisting of 31% Christian and 69% Muslim (a majority of them women). This describes a basic demographics of the area. Sharia is a small part of Islam. It means “path” or “way”, much as the Arabic word, Sabeel, mean “way” or “stream of water”. It has a positive connotation in Islam, but occasionally it is misused by extreme Islamists (much more in Saudi Arabic and Afghanistan than in Palestine). While there is some religious extremism in Islam, there is just as much in Judaism (and of course Christianity has its own version). Where I lived in the Bethlehem area there was total freedom of worship. Muslim and Christian honor each other’s holy days and live in respectful consideration of the others’ religious beliefs. On the other hand, Israel will not allow either Muslim or Christian Palestinians to go to their holy sites in Jerusalem.

BWC: The crisis in Israel-Palestine seems so intractable. I mean, I feel like among our duties as Christians are to hope and to pray, but is peace really possible? What does peace look like for FOSNA?

I often feel that way too. However, if we keep a historical outlook on this seemingly intractable conflict, we realize our humble role in something much bigger than ourselves. The early Abolitionists in America gave a cry in the wilderness and it took 200 more years of building an anti-slavery movement before emancipation. When I first got involved in the Palestinian peace movement in 1989, there was little, if any, interest in the churches on this issue. The churches unfortunately have been ignorant too, have given Israel unconditional support, often motivated by left-over guilt over the Holocaust, not realizing that in supporting any nation state Christians reject Jesus Christ and choose Caesar. It is one thing to say “I didn’t know” (the German excuse) and it is forgivable to not know the truth about every political issue in the world. But the bigger problem is that Christians do not know Christianity, which is profoundly subversive and anti-empire, and deeply nonviolent. First century Christians knew it was a great sin to serve in any army and would be denied Communication for that reason. What does peace look like for FOSNA? It looks like Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, whose vision of the Kingdom of God (on earth, not up in the sky), was based on social equality, justice, and nonviolence, and which was in direct and dangerous conflict with the vision of the Kingdom of Caesar, which was based on power and control and domination. The two cannot co-exist; so Jesus was crucified.

BWC: Supporters of Israel can often deflect criticism of the actions of the Israeli government by labeling it as “antisemitic.” Perhaps its naive, but I’ve thought for a while that small hope for the Israelis and the Palestinians (and, by extension, the whole region) might lie in broadening the definition of “antisemitic” to include the Palestinians, because, of course, the Palestinians are a Semitic people. Naim Ateek talks a bit about this in his book “Justice and Only Justice: A Palestinian Theology of Liberation.” An attempt to relocate the precise meaning of “antisemitic” might yield some common ground to begin conversation and maybe even reconciliation. A single-state solution - an admittedly distant reality - might involve creating a unified Israel-Palestine as a haven of justice for all oppressed Semitic peoples.

The issue is not antisemitism and we do not allow pro-Israel arguments to reduce the problem to that charge. Marc Ellis, a Jewish scholar at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, has told Christians in no uncertain terms that they are not doing Jews any favor by cowing to the fear of being called antisemitic. Israel and its supporters have succeeded in turning propaganda to their benefit with the development of a “New Antisemitism” that include any legitimate criticism of the state of Israel. To be anti-Israeli is to be antisemitic. The criticize Israel violations of international law is to be antisemitic. To condemn Israel’s Apartheid Wall and land confiscation is antisemitic. Even those Israeli Jews or American Jews who dare to criticize the Jewish state are not “real” Jews; they are “self-hating” Jews or some other kind of non-Jew that can be explained-away. Israel does not want two states - Israel and Palestine side by side; it does not want one state either, because then they would have to incorporate non-Jews inside their Jewish state and one day be outnumbered by non-Jews. They don’t want justice; they want victory.

BWC: Regardless of one’s political and theological position on the present conflict, it’s undeniable that what was a dangerous humanitarian crisis in Gaza only two weeks ago is now only getting worse. What can American Christians do to help the innocent Palestinians, including Arab Christians, who are caught in the middle of these powerful and violent forces?

They can insist that our new president change U.S. Middle East Policy. The Palestinian/Israeli issue is a very American issue, considering that Israel is completely dependent on American tax dollars, is using American-made weapons to kill Gazans, is protected in the United Nations Security Council by the U.S. veto on any resolution condemning Israel. We may as well say it outright: America calls the shots, unfortunately, all around the world, in the United Nations where it uses carrots and sticks to get its way, and in Israel where $100 billion plus American dollars has supported Israel’s military exploits against Palestinians for decades.

End

Posted on January 19, 2009 12:00 AM
HR

Comments

You state that - The majority of Palestinians want peace with Israel and would accept a two-state solution -. What is your source for that statement?
The fact is that in 2006 the majority of Palestinians elected Hamas to run their government. In its charter, Hamas calls for the complete destruction of Israel and to REPLACE it with a Palestinian State, they do not accept a two state solution. Hamas also states thate there is no solution to the Palestinain question but jihad.
(Source: Hamas Charter, 1988)
Responding to Sister Kelley:
The reason that Israelis bring up the Holocaust and say "never again" is not because the Palestinians had anything to do with the Holocaust but because the Hamas charter is genocidal.
The real villian in this conflict is not Israel but Hamas. The answer is not to have America stop supporting Israel with tax dollars. (Then Hamas wins and continues to push for destroying Israel). If there were a peaceful Palestinian government that would work diplomatically with Israel then Israel would have no reason to use its military to respond when attacked. Instead we should call for a regime change in Palestine and for end of support to terrorist organizations such as Hamas and demand that nations such as Iran and Syria stop financing Hamas. And pray for peace becasue prayer really does work. Since Sister Kelley lives among the Palestinians maybe she could convince those she has influence with to stop using violence and instead look to peaceful solutions to this conflict.

Vince,

A number of polls and surveys have been conducted over the last few years which indicate majority Palestinian support for a two-state solution. In 2002, a survey conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes found that 72% of Palestinians favored a settlement with Israel that included a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders, though many expressed doubts that Israel would ever make the necessary concessions. In September 2006, just months after elections brought Hamas to power, 67% of Palestinians favored continued peace talks with Israel and 58% supported a two-state solution, according to a poll by the Birzeit University Development Studies Programme. A poll conducted in March 2007 put the number of Palestinians who prefer a two-state solution at 47%. The percentage was lower than in previous polls because respondents were asked to choose which solution they preferred, not which solution they would support. Forty-seven percent said a two state solution; 27% favored a bi-national state. If you don't want to take the time looking for specific polls, you can read articles in the New York Times, the New York Review of Books, Tikkun Magazine, Sojourners, and statements by evangelical leaders published in Christianity Today.

It's worth noting that evidence seems to suggest, at least anecdotally, that Palestinian support for a two-state solution seems to have dropped in recent years. I can only assume this reflects a growing frustration among the Palestinian people over the crippling embargo, the apartheid wall, the worsening humanitarian crisis, the repeated broken promises of the Israeli government, and the Palestinian people's near-abandonment by much of the international community, up to and including the United States.

Vince, I agree that we should pray. But where in the Gospels does Jesus say "Be peaceful when your enemy is peaceful"? Or "Lay down your sword when he does"?

And your admonition to Sister Elaine Kelley (who, by the way, doesn't live in Palestine at this time) that she should use her influence to convince Palestinians to stop using violence and consider peaceful solutions to the conflict, even as you defend Israel's use of violence and the support the use of American Christian's tax dollars to pay for it, is frankly hypocritical. I would go further and say that we all have spheres of influence in which we can promote peace. Not just Sabeel in Palestine, but John in Portland, and Ben in North Carolina, and Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, and Berean Church in Lincoln, and wherever you are, Vince. It should be remembered that working for peace is working for both the interests of Jews and Palestinians, with equal empathy and with the same commitment to justice.

The Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, an independent polling organization based in the West Bank did a poll in March of 2008. According to its polls, 84 percent of Palestinians approved of an attack where a Palestinian gunman killed 8 Israeli teenage students that month. Moreover, 64 percent approved of Hamas randomly firing rockets and mortars from Gaza into Israeli communities, and 75 percent favored ending negotiations between their leaders and the Israeli government. We could go back and forth with the polls but I find it interesting that I read a constant rebuke of Israel and not one word of repudiation of Hamas from you. Just because someone supports Israel's right to exist does not mean they support violence by the way.
What I am incredibly disappointed in is the fact that you equate support for Israel as support for violence, and support for Palestinians as support for justice.
The hypocrisy is in the fact that you and others such as Sister Kelley call for peace and for Israel to stop its fighting and for the U.S. to stop supporting Israel but never say a word challenging the Palestinians to do the same. If you're going to challenge for peace, you should do it all the way around.

Vince,

You say that this interview calls for peace but never says a word challenging the Palestinians to renounce violence.

This is the second sentence of Sister Kelley's response to my first question: "Briefly, we [FOSNA] oppose all violence, whether it is Israel or Hamas, but work to educate people about the great disparity of power between Israel and the oppressed Palestinian population in Gaza."

Vince, I am being honest when I say that I really appreciate your engagement with this interview, this topic. We may disagree but this kind of reasoned, respectful dialogue is what I was hoping for in the Comments section.

Thanks for responding.

My favorite part of the interview was:

"What does peace look like for FOSNA? It looks like Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace, whose vision of the Kingdom of God (on earth, not up in the sky), was based on social equality, justice, and nonviolence, and which was in direct and dangerous conflict with the vision of the Kingdom of Caesar, which was based on power and control and domination. The two cannot co-exist; so Jesus was crucified."

In discussing issues of seemingly intractable conflict, it can be easy to suffer from a lack of imagination regarding alternatives. Violence is both the easy and normative way of dealing with conflict, and Jesus commissioned his disciples to live otherwise. Whether it be from physical violence (turn the other cheek), economic violence (blessed are the poor), or social violence (bless those who curse you), Jesus called his disciples to repent.

We who would be disciples must lead the way in imagining and practicing Spirit-led alternatives to violence. Perhaps we could learn much from our Palestinian brothers and sisters in this regard.

to Vince's

"What I am incredibly disappointed in is the fact that you equate support for Israel as support for violence":

Think through what sort of "support" is being offered to Israel. Israel receives absurdly huge amounts of international aid money from the USA. Israel receives vastly disproportionate political backing and protection in international political bodies (ie UN). Moreover, like this most recent situation in Gaza--when Bush interrupted a speech to take a call from an Israeli foreign minister, who got Bush to tell Sec. State Rice to rescind her support for a U.N. resolution to end the Israeli offensive--Israel often receives this political protection from the US when their behavior is horrifically unjust.

Additionally, and most problematically, the "support" of Israel has largely translated purely into Military resources: many planes bombing the Gaza Strip were F-16s (American Fighter Jets). In this sort of case involving Military support--which is, mind you, the most prevalent and significant sort of "support" that Israel receives--"support" literally does mean "violence." Military machinations of any sort function to produce destruction, you can't get around that; investing in this sort of lopsided violence-empowering "support" clearly is to the negation of a peaceful, political solution. Christ's claim is that peace is a reality which we must believe in, and involve ourselves in. The quality of US "support" of Israel excludes even-handed diplomacy and aid to Palestine, makes the violent capacity more potent, and ignores belief in sustainable agape peace as a possibility. This is not to say that Palestine is right in their violence, but their violence is rooted in a different system of support, and has been enacted in a much different way; this requires a commensurately different response. This necessity is why Pattison's article responds to the Palestinian problem as it does.

Abram, you kind of reinforce my statement in my previous response. You equate support for Israel and their right to exist as support for violence because they receive aid money from the US. If you use that reasoning then you would have to say that support for Palestinians and their right of return as support for violence as well because of the aid and money that flows in from Iran and Syria to support suicide bombings and rocket attacks on Israeli communities. I don't believe for a moment that you support that.
Scripture is filled with stories on how God supported the Jewish people but did not always support what they did. I bet you can think of of some people in your own life that you support but don't always support their actions.
Here is a good article that shows support for Israel does not mean blind militant support.
http://www.new-life.net/israel.htm

No, I do not approve of Iran and Syria funding Palestinian violence against Israel, and nothing I've said implies this. An ostensible support of "right to return" (or safety of Israeli civilians) as a principle does not necessarily approve of Palestinian violence. But my opinions aren't what matters--its the fact that the support which grows out of US tax dollars directly produces and furthers the ability to produce violence. If we are voting in the US, we are implicated, as we would be if we had influence in Syria or Iran.

Claims of God's support to Israel in scripture being commensurate to US support of Israel is extremely tenuous. Please explain to me how you see God's particular instances of support of Israel in relation to the facts of the particular qualities of US support of Israel and in what specific ways the US supports them, and what conclusions are available from those particulars.

I'm not sure I understand what you were trying to get at with the article you linked to. It seems to approach the conflict only in terms of how it relates to our vision of where the Israeli state lies in relation to how God has or has not maintained a relation to them: whether Christians attempt to "de-legitimize the Jewish people as God's chosen." I don't see how that can possibly be stakes of the issue at hand. It does not account for how the violence occurs, where the conflicts are coming from, or even our response to violence--it only consider the position of Jews as objects of evangelism and election and theological consideration. Please explain how that is related to how we consider peace and war, and our "support" for it?

"Support" as a concept can mean anything, but as I said before, the actual, tangible, effective realities of the ways in which the US "supports" Israel, are a type of "support" which promotes violence. There are other, and better, ways of "supporting." Support should be offered to those who need it: the "oppressed," this involves people from both sides of the conflict. This conflict, however, is uneven, and that needs to be considered in how we negotiate our role, especially since the US' role has long been to maintain the unevenness of the conflict. We need to take account of what we are actually doing in the name of "support" and what consequences it has.

Thank you for this article. People can argue all day long about which polls are accurate, and so on and so forth. The truth is, NOBODY wants their children to die. Nobody. This reminds me of my time in Romania, where even the most oppressed and impoverished still look on the gypsies like worthless people. Violence is never okay, peace does look like Jesus Christ, and even though total peace may never be achieved, I honestly believe that God will honor not only those who pray for it, but those who WORK for it and the survivial of all his precious creations.

"Enter you in at the strait gate. For wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it" (Matthew 7:13-14).

Jesus of Nazareth the Christ and Messiah (An Illustrated Collection of Bible Notes)

His Vision, His Message of the Strait Gate: "The time is fulfilled and the kingdom of God is near. Repent and believe the gospel" (Mark 1:15.) A book for the End of Days.

Hot New Book Release From www.CSNbooks.com!!!

The Lord Jesus said, "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come" (Matthew 24:14.) Are you interested in a comprehensive narrative of the genuine gospel story of Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ? You don�t have to flip back and forth between the four gospels or use a concordance. Everything is right here at your fingertips in this wonderful bible aid.

Imagine hearing the gospel accounts for the first time, as the first Christian disciples heard it, but now in �surround sound,� as details from multiple writers provide a fuller, richer telling of this amazing story. While many stories in the synoptic gospels are similar, each writes from his own perspective to different audiences. (Matthew, a former tax collector, focused on the Gentiles, Luke work from Paul, a missionary�s point of view, Mark work from Peter�s perspective, a view from Jesus� inner circle and Christian Gate-keeper and finally, John was the great revelator and closes friend of the Lord, wrote from Jesus� divinity.) The material contained in this book is not written from the author�s or any denominational viewpoint; but is strictly taken from the four gospel accounts and actual historical events of the Lord Jesus� time on earth.

A pathway leading to the famous and allusive �Strait Gate� (Matthew 7:13-14), this bible study guide is a must read for Christian growth and salvation (Mark 16:15-16.) Hearing all four voices in one reading brings a revived, more complete understanding of the life and times of Jesus Christ, as a great prophet, teacher, master miracle worker and Son of God. Within the pages of this simple, 278-page paperback with illustrations and maps, Christians will be encouraged to become biblical scholars of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Therefore, rededicating their membership into Jesus� discipleship (John 8:31), and God�s �Little Flock� (Luke 12:32).

Chapter illustrations and headings, such as �A Withered Right Hand,� keep the reader focused on Christ�s life and message. A ten-part index or KJV Bookmarks allows any reader to easily skip from place to place inside the gospel. Whether one has recently come to faith or is preparing to embark on missionary service, this teaching guide is a valuable gospel resource. Here, the reader is presented with Jesus Christ as a great prophet, teacher, master miracle worker and Son of God.

Intended for youth ministries, teens, college students and adults, it combines the King James gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John into a single chronological narrative. It is also especially suited for the needs of those newly converted to the Christian faith. Nearly 120 Old Testament references are embedded throughout the body of the text for scriptural validation of the gospel, proving without a doubt that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ. What a wonderful endeavor to be appreciated by all faiths to learn Gods divine will for His people by showing us His wonderful story. Come and allow yourself to step back into gospel time, and walk in the Lord Jesus� footsteps!

Jonathan B. Hobbs
JBHobbs77a@aol.com

Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, we may need to approve you before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear.

Take time to visit