Go Down Swinging
For my birthday last November, my wife gave me a subscription to Sports Illustrated. I had not received this magazine since I was a kid, and looked forward to February when I would finally get to gawk at a swimsuit issue before my mom could incinerate it. Turns out, wives detest scantily clad Eastern Bloc beauties even more than mothers; so needless to say, I never saw the issue Tricia referred to as “porn”.
Even though I did not get to see women with names like Petra frolicking around the rain forest wearing mesh bikinis, I do enjoy the magazine. This week Rick Reilly’s column in particular grabbed my attention, and has kept my mind spinning over the moral dilemma it presents.
Let me set it up for you. Imagine a nine-and-10-year-old PONY league championship game in Bountiful, Utah. If you do not know what Bountiful, Utah looks like, just imagine the game being held in a city you are familiar with, only with Mormons. The Yankees lead the Red Sox by one run in the bottom of the last inning, with two outs, and a runner on third base. The Red Sox’s best hitter steps to the plate with a chance to tie the game, and on deck stands a kid named Romney, a pint-sized cancer survivor who has to take human growth hormone, just like Barry Bonds. Unlike Bonds, Romney also has a shunt in his brain.
Now imagine you are the Yankees manager. Do you pitch to the slugger, or intentionally walk him to face the cancer-kid, virtually ensuring your team the championship?
Well, the real Yankees coach, Bob Farley, decide to walk the star. The move sent Romney’s sister into tears, drew boos from the angry Red Sox parents, and won his team the championship when Romney inevitably struck out. Later assistant coach Shaun Farr chalked up the move to good strategy and explained, “This isn’t the Special Olympics. He’s not retarded.”
Backlash from the community was immediate. The local sports editor wrote that he hoped Farley and Farr, “Enjoy the trophy on their mantel, right next to their dunce caps.” A Utah State House candidate called the move, “Shameful”. My friend Jeremy said, “Dude, this year the bikinis were made of Saran Wrap!”
Of course, some in the community agree with the Yankees move, and say kids need to learn that life is not always fair. As if a kid with a tube in his head has not grasped that concept yet.
I am not entirely sure how to feel about all of this, but I do have some questions. First, why didn’t the Yankee coaches make the walk of the slugger look unintentional? Throw him four bad pitches, if he swings great, if not, great. And second, assuming the slugger was batting cleanup, why was Romney batting fifth? Are there four hitters on the team worse than him? If so, how did this team get to the championship game to begin with?
It is doubtful that I ever find the answers to those questions, because quite frankly, I don’t care enough to look. But I do think I can offer some perspective on things that young Romney will one day appreciate.
Nearing thirty, I struggle daily with the fact that I am not yet famous. In fact, my MySpace alter ego is more popular than I am. So Looking back at the thousands of times I struck out in PONY League baseball, I would gladly let a Sports Illustrated columnists chronicle my failure, even if I did not have a great excuse, like cancer. At this point, I just want to be noticed. As Whitney Houston once said, “The only difference between fame and infamy is…hey look some crack!”
So with fame in mind, everything I now do is geared towards getting my name out there. If fact, my living will states that if I enter a vegetative state, I shall be kept on a ventilator until both Nancy Grace and Greta Van Susteren devote two weeks on their shows talking about nothing but Chad, then you can pull the plug. I know this may sound a little morbid, but that is only because it is.
Now back to the point. If you happen to have an old copy of the swimsuit issue, would you mind sending it to my work address?
You can read Rick Reilly’s column here, and you can read about the history of pickles here.

Posted on August 15, 2006 12:00 AM



Comments
What a sad story! I can't believe that these little leaguers have to play in Saran Wrap uniforms. What?! Oh those were the bikini models. Ok, it's all becoming very clear now.
Posted by: Tim | August 17, 2006 9:01 AM
As a youth coach for eight years, I have some observations on this dilemma. First, to your two good questions: 1) Kids that age don't possess the control to 'unintentionally intentionally' walk a batter. With a runner on 3rd, they would have run a better than even chance of wild pitching the tying run home. 2) As to why poor Romney was batting behind the team's best hitter, methinks this is how good stories become great tales. I would be willing to bet that Romney was hitting 9th and the opposing team walked the 8th-place hitter to get to him, OR, Romney's team had a big lead that they lost and Romney had been inserted into the game when they were winning, OR, Romney is not the terrible hitter that the story implies him to be.
In a championship game, at any level or age-group, in any sport, coaches are going to do what they can, within the rules of the game, to win. I would presume that if this had been a regular season game, the coaches might have acted differently. I would have hated to hear the cries of the parents of Romney's opponents if they had lost the game because the 'big slugger' was pitched to. By the age of ten, kids can begin to understand the nuances of the sport their playing. Granted, if these kids were six or seven, then the competitive aspects wouldn't be in play (they wouldn't be having 'championship' games anyway).
My take is, if the general consensus of the community in question does not condone this course of action that the opposing coach took, then by all means, don't have championship-type games at that age. Otherwise, you are teaching kids contradictory lessons.
-Brent Bourgeois
Posted by: Brent Bourgeois | August 17, 2006 9:35 AM
Mr. Gibbs, enjoyed your article. I’ve thought about this delicate situation and have a few suggestions that I think may have helped the loosing coach:
Have the slugger ‘fake’ like he had cancer when he was walking up to bat. As in, “Darn this cancer, messing with my swing again!” Make the opposing pitcher think, “Oh man, what do I do now? Which kid has more cancer?”
Have the weaker kid bunt. ‘Let the shunt bunt’ I always say. Let the shunt bunt. I always say that.
Gather all the children around and calmly explain that this is in fact just a game, and that the real cancer is womankind’s hatred towards scantily clad Eastern Bloc beauties. Tru dat.
Regards,
Aaron D.
Posted by: Aaron Donley | August 18, 2006 11:11 AM
Hey help a brotheer out here! As I am enjoying the Sports Illus. article comments on the ethics of little league, I could not help but notice the enticing side collumn advertisement to purchase past S.I. swimsuit issues. Don't get me wrong here I enjoy (probably way more than I should) the beauty of the female bod as much as any male with a pulse, but is that really appropriate advertising for a site that I am sure wants to encourage the brothers to personal purity. I love your site and I am sure that the vast majority (if not everyone) is way holier than me so help me out here. what am I missing. I love the anti-religious, love of the truth attitude of this site. The swimsuit issue promo just seems out of place.
Brad H.
Posted by: Brad Hill | August 22, 2006 2:03 PM
Brad,
We at the central office have reviewed the issue in question over, and over, and over again and have unequivocally determined, after one last perusal, that this particular issue is riddled with sin and should not therefore be viewed by anyone who doesn't possess the 'armor' to withstand its devilish wiles. Thanks for pointing this out.
-The Management
Posted by: Brent Bourgeois | August 23, 2006 11:41 AM
In all seriousness, we have no control over the ads in the left column. They are decided by Google ads.
Posted by: Jordan Green | August 30, 2006 10:34 AM