The CFL Sucks and Other Musings
People will try to tell you that the world of sport has become cliché. For the last few years things have seemed relatively stable. Lance Armstrong was always winning the Tour de France, the Spurs or Pistons were trading NBA championships, the Super Bowl was a toss-up every year and no one cared much about the World Series.
And what of the players? Can they be counted on for variety? There were the usual suspects like Barry Bonds in baseball and Allen Iverson’s rant on practice. Shaq is usually a lock for some entertaining quotes and Temple head coach John Chaney did send out one of his players to intentionally injure an opponent. More recently there has been Ocho Cinqo and obscene gestures from Mike Vick. Maybe he should convince Randy Moss it’s a great idea to moon another stadium, you know, to divert the negative attention away.
The truth is, there’s always something happening in sport to keep us interested. It is a world that functions almost like high school; there is drama, egos, immature attitudes and yes, cheerleaders. And if the drama among the athletes isn’t enough to keep you interested the NBA, MLB and NHL are all experiencing a changing of the guard. Their older superstars have made, or are currently making, graceful exits while young, exciting, and marketable players are taking up their residence in the spotlight.
Here are some of the things that have kept me interested in the past few weeks.
1. It’s trendy to hate- I’ve come to realize there is a vicious cycle that follows the world’s greatest athletes. I first took notice with NHL phenom Sidney Crosby, who at 18 became the youngest player ever to score more than 100 points in a season, finishing with 102. Crosby’s rookie campaign was one of the most exciting ever, though it was slightly overshadowed by another rookie—Washington winger Alexander Ovechkin, a Russian superstar who at 20 years-old scored 106 points (52 goals, 54 assists) and became a media darling in his first year in North America. Ovechkin found he enjoyed life in the spotlight while Crosby was received criticism despite being similarly talented. He was called a whiner, immature and not ready to handle the pressure.
It is somewhat ironic that Crosby’s critics were mostly middle-aged men who never had the talent to play in the NHL, nevermind as an 18 year-old, the best player on his team and a nightly target for the opposition to antagonize- while none of his teammates would stick up for him. That irony aside, I think I’ve figured out why it is that people began to hate Sidney Crosby. The reality is that Sidney Crosby came to national prominence in Canada as a 16 year-old. At 16, he was the biggest story in Canadian hockey, daily being followed on sports networks and in the newspapers. Two incredible seasons of Canadian Junior hockey and one NHL lockout pitted Crosby as the future of the league—the only player who could win back the hearts of the NHL’s estranged fans after the lockout. People praised him for his off-ice poise and maturity while scouts drooled over his other-worldly skill on the ice. He was hockey’s messiah. The next Great One, like LeBron was hailed the next Mike.
All the while, Ovechkin was able to develop in Russia, off the radar of the NHL fans. Three-years later, the Crosby honeymoon period had run its course and just like celebrity marriages, things fell apart fast. People jumped off of the bandwagon and threw Crosby under the bus. All ‘Sid the Kid’ did was put an NHL franchise that was on the verge of folding on his back and carry them through the entire 82 game season. For his troubles he was languished with labels that diminished his character and integrity. Meanwhile Ovechkin experienced the joys of having his skills discovered for the first time, allowing those sick of hearing about Crosby to become ‘Ovie’ proponents.
I thought maybe Crosby was the only one to receive the brunt of this superstar hatred but I see similarities in Peyton Manning. Peyton was popular for a while, as an up and coming gunslinger, but somewhere along the lines everyone decided to hate him. Now I can’t find someone who wants Peyton Manning to win. I personally don’t care, I’m not a huge football fan one way or the other, but it’s interesting. Everyone loves Tom Brady, because he wins titles and appears in movies and dates movie stars—but Peyton is criticized because all he wants to do is win. Isn’t that what we supposedly want from athletes? To ignore the fluff and trappings of fame, and care only about producing a win on game day?
It makes me wonder who’s next? LeBron is a prime candidate, though his overall likeability will mean he shouldn’t endure what Kobe Bryant did. He is marketable, talented beyond what anyone could ever believe and playing for a team that is a while away from winning. Some already question if LeBron has the ‘killer instinct’ needed to win in the NBA (the Cavs are 2nd in the Eastern Conference). The reality is, no matter who you are and what you’ve done, sports fans run on an internal cycle. A few years at the top and you can seemingly do no wrong. Then they tire of you, throwing you off your pedestal as fast and far as possible so that the Next One can be anointed. They did it to Gretzky, they tried to do it to Jordan (with the Gambling) and they did it to Vince Carter. Talent won’t save these athletes, sooner or later, the hate is coming.
2. Pre-season predictions are useless— It has become true that I hate pre-season predictions above all other forms of sportswriting. They are nothing more than a platform for useless jargon about what writers think should happen. Or, instead, they go way out on a limb and make a bold prediction simply to be different. Don’t forget about the supposed ‘dark horse’ that every analyst and their mother picks and then passes off as though it is some big inside scoop (read: Chicago Bulls, Pittsburgh Penguins). And I am guilty of it too. When a new season is about to start there is a lot of excitement and nothing else to write about except speculation. The result is we all write, and guess, and then use those predictions to either brag about how sweet we are at guessing the same things as other writers or as published evidence of how little we actually know about sports.
Look at the NBA this year. It’s crazy. The Boston Celtics currently lead the Atlantic division with a .385 winning percentage while the Clippers languish in the bottom of the Pacific with a .500 record. And how many season previews did you read that had the Chicago Bulls as a ‘dark horse’ to come out of the Central division and win the Eastern Conference title? Too many for them to currently have a 4-9 start to the season. Oh, so you picked LeBron James to be the league MVP? You must have been the only one. Do not even get me started on the Utah Jazz and Orlando Magic— I swear I’m going to have an aneurysm.
3. Canadian MVP’s- With Justin Morneau named as the MVP of the American League, it seems I should address two issues. First, people need to stop complaining. Would I have voted for Derek Jeter? Almost certainly, but the reality is that when you get to this level of talent, the margins that separate these players is so miniscule we need to turn to the votes of sportswriters as arbitrators to make these decisions. It was close. A talented guy won and other talented guys didn’t. It happens in every league, every season and yet every time people act surprised or angry.
That being said, Morneau being named MVP means that Canada has been producing a slew of top notch athletes. Joe Thornton (London, Ontario) is the reigning MVP in the NHL, Steve Nash (Victoria, British Columbia) is the two-time MVP of the NBA and now Morneau (New Westminster, British Columbia) is the American League MVP. If it sounds like I’m bragging, you may find it is because I am. It is a remarkable feat not likely to happen again to Canada for a long time. We have to take what we can get up here. Have you heard that we live in igloos?
4. Who cares about Canadian Football? Absolutely no one.- You thought it was only Americans that don’t care about Canadian Football? Last weekend, (or maybe it was two weekends ago, I don’t remember) the Grey Cup (CFL’s Superbowl) game was on. The epic title game pitted the BC Lions against the Montreal Alouettes. I know I should have been watching, because I love sports and it is a championship game. Instead I had the game on mute and did homework, and I’m almost certain that the work was more stimulating. Later I talked to my dad on the phone and our conversation went something like this. “Hey dad, did you watch the Grey Cup?” to which he replied plainly, “for about ten minutes, but it was boring so I flipped it to Nascar. Wanted to see if Jimmie Johnson was going to win the Nextel Cup.”
That about sums up the feeling that Canadians have for the CFL, or rather, the lack of feelings Canadians have for the CFL. I have yet to speak with a person who watched the game, and I live in the city of the victorious team.
5. College Football- Chad Gibbs is a great guy. You may well be familiar with him, as he regularly contributes hilarious articles to the BWC. Chad introduced me to the world of NCAA Football this season, and let me say, that is an arena where anxiety reigns supreme. I was previously unable to immerse myself in college football, mostly due to being unable to geographically link myself to a team. I think the closest NCAA school to my hometown is the University of Niagara, and I don’t know if they have a football team, nor am I willing to waste valuable time researching that fact. Nonetheless, through interacting with Chad I was allowed the privilege of cheering for the Auburn Tigers, and after a few history lessons and some interesting insights I was excited to have a school to support, so I could get into the hype machine of college football.
But let me say, the whole college system is built on stress and anxiety. Your team plays once a week, and one loss ruins your chance at a national title. Every play is so important and the pressure is astronomical. It’s is equal parts exhilarating and emotionally draining. The only thing better than the crowds is the hype. But in college football disappointment reigns supreme. My buddy Jordan cheers for the Oregon St. Beavers, and was overheard talking about how glad he is that Oregon St. is “going to get a sweet bowl game.” The whole thing seems so defeatist to me. I was watching football games and clutching the couch cushions like I was on a white knuckle flight. The Tigers lost to Arkansas and at the time they were #2 in the country. They now sit at #11 and I am certain that I jinxed them and that I am at fault for their having lost two games and no longer being in contention for a national title. I am thinking of sending Chad a letter of apology. More on college football in two weeks.
6. The Movie ‘Miracle’- Hockey is my favorite sport but I hadn’t seen this movie. I knew it was going to be relatively crap-tastic because it’s a Disney film, and all Disney’s attempts at athletic movies have been horrible, but the allure of the frozen game drew me in. All in all, I thought the movie kind of sucked, but Herb Brooks seems like he was the man. The best scene was when he made the team stay on the ice and skate suicides after their exhibition game in Norway. He was relentlessly skating them into the ground, telling them that basically they sucked and were worthless. The assistant coach and doctor had the ‘I think someone is going to die on the ice,’ look on their faces, but Herb didn’t care. He kept sending them and shouting degrading comments. People may question those coaching tactics, but I found the notion extremely entertaining. Can you imagine any coach trying that now? Athletes today are coddled like pageant-winning babies, and any coach who tries to get the most out of them is quickly cast aside as soon as the resident superstar casts a sideways glance. Can you imagine Coach K getting so mad at the American Semi-Final loss in the World Championships that he forces the team to line up on the baseline in Japan and run suicides until they kill the lights? I’m in the Herb Brooks fan club.
The runner-up for best Miracle moment was that the Russians were portrayed as heartless and cheap. The Canada-Russia hockey rivalry is one that I could write books about, so I was glad to see the United States took it to them and made it clear who had no class. And for the record, if Canada is out of contention, I do cheer for the U.S. My friend Connor summed it up best when he said, “it wasn’t just about hockey, it was political.” No kidding.

Posted on December 1, 2006 12:00 AM



Comments
Great insight except for point #4. You ask "Who cares about Canadian Football? Absolutely no one." I respectfully beg to differ. The players do; Doug Flutie, Damon Allen, Christopher Perez (all-pros, Grey Cup Champions) These guys, and many others would be quick to tell you that they care because they've had the privilege of competing, not the press, not the big paychecks or endorsement contracts. For a few years, they get to make a living playing a game they love with friends they care deeply about...whether or not anyone's watching. Then again, someone must be watching. The CFL has been around longer than the NFL!
Posted by: Tomas Perez | December 3, 2006 10:45 PM
Tomas, you are certainly right. And due to that fact that I am a star in my rec hockey league, I should have understood playing for the love of the game better than anyone. I meant 'who cares' from a fans standpoint. Not from the players. I do appreciate you reading the column and contributing your thoughts.
Posted by: Jon | December 4, 2006 1:50 PM
The CFL is simply the best brand of football around.
Argos in '07!
Posted by: Chris Fischer | December 21, 2006 10:03 AM
dude, jon dude. this article (especially the cfl part) made me howl. who knew there were actually CFL fans out there? i loved your retorting comment but it was also accepting in your usual gentlemanly manor.
i am catching up on all your old stuff. oh, and you are right. no one TRULY cares about the CFL. some people may SORT OF care but not TRULY.
Posted by: MATT MCKECHNIE | January 12, 2007 4:19 PM
THE MONEY IS IN THE NFL BUT THE SHOW IS IN THE CFL.
CFL is the only pro sport left not being corrupted by money. I do not want to be honed by NFL and turn it to a circus like them. CFL game is a lot more entertaining, faster the players are not spoil brats. Many former NFL players don�t even make a CFL team. It is well under estimated league. Ask Warren Moon, Doug Flutie, Jos Theisman, David Archer and Jeff Garcia to name a few.
� As an American (and huge CFL fan) we could only be so fortunate as to gain added exposure to your great league. The CFL is by far the most exciting brand of football out there - most Americans would be absolutly shocked with the quality of play. If the NFL and NCAA were to adapt a few of your rules� USA CFL FAN, on Nov 20, 2005, Michigantech.
�I am American and I moved to Toronto about 6 years ago, from Florida. I have found a real love for the CFL and for the Argos. Personally I think that NFL is way overhyped and when you watch it you think to yourself "That's IT???". Always expecting more and waiting for something spectacular, which never actually happens. The CFL is exciting football with exciting players.�- USA/Canadian blog.
I do have eyes, booooring NFL games are not for me. �There�s too many boring games in the NFl � John Madden 2005. He can say that again !
So you can keep your 10 to 7 scores and have a good sleep!
Posted by: CFLman | July 19, 2007 2:25 PM
One of your biggest problems is your small NFL football field. Very talented but small football players have little chance in this league. But those exiting players are welcome in Canada. Like all players from the states, they have to adapt do. Not all can, even if they where stars in college football or played years in the NFL. Of course you need fast and very mobile defense to stop them. You do not see in the CFL lineman that can�t run. Often you see those running 20 yards to make a bloc. Nearly every play it�s a battle for the field position. No such thing to watch a football untouched after a kick! Defense, offense and special teams are equally important in the CFL.
With only two downs to make ten yards, the offense is force to take chances. It�s a more open game. It�s very hard on quarterbacks. Not much place for error. CFL is a passing league. Wide field and the extra player makes defense reading more difficult. Passing on the wide side of a CFL fied it�s very hard to master. To spread the defense, a quarterback has to do it. He cannot stay in his pocket all the time. He needs to throw from different places. Most of the CFL quarterbacks are mobile. Being a passing league and a bigger football field, it�s very hard on receivers too. They run a lot and have only 20 seconds between each play. In the first year in the CFL, former NFL players or those relieved from training camps, many have legs aches. Endurance is very important in the CFL. Lots of speed and very little time to catch your breath!
The NFL it�s all about the outside of the box. Lot�s of clamor, show of, but very little in the inside. That�s why in the Super bowls they talk more about the TV commercials and the half time show then the game by itself! NFL is very rich. For 16 years they support a 30 millions lost each year in Europe. Remember, they played the NFL�s style of football! If the show was that good, Europe will steel have football!
We all know with money you can sell anything to anyone! This is the real success of the NFL, not on the quality of the show. Dollar for dollar in this aspect, CFL outperformed NFL by far!
Posted by: CFLman | July 28, 2007 10:23 AM
The CFL sucks? Are you kidding me! I've had season tickets for years and it's great and also great I'm watching guys play for a ring and trophy rather than big corrupted money. The Grey Cup is Canada's national football championship and has been played since 1909. TV ratings, while not those of the NHL of Canadian teams, often exeed those of the "major" league Blue Jays and NFL games.
Fact is the CFL is Canada's league and I'm proud of it, I love it like I love Canada. Sure it's had it's ups and downs, reflects my country Canada in many ways. And it's the only pro league totally operated by Canadians for Canadians. Did you know buddy that McGill showed Harvard back in 1984 that rugby football was more fun than soccer, the type of football they played in the US at the time. And the Harvard boys loved it and said to heck with soccer, we love this Canadian game of running with the ball. Of course, with their population there, they developed it. But 3 or 4 down my friend, it's all gridiron football, blocking, tackling, running, passing, kicking. I love the CFL, NFL, CIS, NCAA and football that is gridiron where guys hit each other. Don't you? Or is football, 3 or 4 down or whatever, too tough for you? That's my guess bud. lol
Posted by: Mike | August 9, 2007 11:05 AM
One correction, the 1984 date I mentioned where McGill and Harvard played each other should be 1874, long time ago.
Football rocks, whatever league, whatever country, as long as it's gridiron!
Posted by: Mike | August 9, 2007 11:19 AM