Thank You…David Stern?
This may come as a surprise to you, but we may actually need to thank David Stern. In less than a month we’ll be treated to one of the wildest, most entertaining NCAA tournaments we’ve ever seen. That’s saying a lot considering the tourney’s reputation is built on fans being able to expect the unexpected.
But when the chips fall where they will in March, and we have more memorable moments than CBS will be able to fit into their ‘One Shining Moment’ montage (but oh, they’ll try), it’ll be Stern who deserves the credit. It is his minimum draft age requirement that is treating us to one of the best freshman classes, and college basketball seasons, in recent memory.
Ohio State features the much publicized Greg Oden, who was a lock for the first overall pick before the world discovered the Texas Longhorns 6’9” forward Kevin Durant, whose per game averages of 24.9 points and 11.4 rebounds have him pushing Oden for that top-pick. Not to mention making himself a candidate for the Wooden award. North Carolina has a talented freshman trio of Brandon Wright, Ty Lawson and Wayne Ellington, though among them, only Wright could have gone prep-to-pro. Those three are currently ranked as the top-three prospects in America on NBAdraft.net.
All of this means we’ve had a wild few months of basketball. This week, Duke dropped out of the top-25 for the first time in 11 years (holy Bobby Hurley Batman!). The top teams in the country, Florida, UNC, Ohio St., Kansas, UCLA and Wisconsin (arguably) have all at times looked equal part National title contender and Sweet Sixteen pretender.
The #1 ranked Florida Gators have big wins against Ohio St and Tennessee, but they also have losses to Kansas and Florida St. Ohio St, ranked #2 have three losses, but they were to the Gators, Wisconsin Badgers and North Carolina, all top-four teams. The Buckeyes have no real impressive wins this season, and only one major match-up remaining, against the Wisconsin Badgers. #4 North Carolina has three big wins against Ohio St, Arizona and Duke, but they also carry blemishes suffered from losses to Gonzaga, Virginia Tech (twice), and NC State. UCLA sits at #5, and were the pre-season #1 but have fallen to the likes of Stanford and West Virginia, though they have big wins against Arizona, # 6 Texas A&M, Oregon and surprising Washington St, who have snuck into the #10 spot.
Like that paragraph, the outlook is muddled. I’m not in love with Florida, and the only game I’ve seen them in this season is when they beat Ohio St, and they looked good doing it. From every highlight pack I’ve seen it’s apparent no one can stop the Gators from running and gunning. Al Horford is a steady defender and rebounder (spell check has informed me that rebounder is in fact, not an actual word) which allows Joakim Noah to get out on the break and fill the lane for easy dunks. If Noah was forced to play the five he’d be less effective, and since he won’t play the five in the NBA, Horford’s presence plays to Noah’s strengths. Meanwhile, Al has seen his own stock rise and could also be a lottery pick. Ultra-lanky swingman Corey Brewer gives them more size (6’9”) and athleticism on the wing.
Greg Oden has won me over. Last week against Purdue he ran the length of the floor and blocked an open lay-up. I was struck at how well he ran for a 7-footer. Let’s face it, most of us expect big men to run like Eric Montross or Gheorghe Muresan. I’m a little tired of hearing everyone rave about Oden shooting free throws with his left-hand, but in truth, I’m probably only tired of it due to extreme jealousy. I mean come on! Left-handed? Once Oden wraps his brain around the term ‘defensive rotation’ he’ll be unstoppable at both ends of the court. Also, I would love to see him fight Georgetown’s Roy Hibbert. It would be insane, about 16 feet of total reach and just limbs flailing everywhere. One of them would accidentally knock out the other’s cut man. No one between the center of the ring and the first row would be safe.
Equally important to the Buckeye’s success is freshman guard Mike Conley Jr, who played with Oden at Lawrence high. I’ve watched a handful of OSU games this season and Conley has impressed each time. He’s averaging 10.4 points per game, 6.3 assists and 52.7% from the field, he’s strong and athletic and has the ability to put points on the board when Oden is nailed to the bench with foul trouble.
I really like North Carolina. If you forced me to a pick a team right now, gun to my head, that’s who it’d be. Of course everyone will rave about Hansbrough, and in truth, though I’m not a huge proponent of him, I’ve never seen him have a bad game. I think the key for the Tar Heels will be their trio of freshman, Brandon Wright, Ty Lawson and Wayne Ellington. Wright (14.6 pts, 6.6 reb, 64.7%) is a world-class athlete at 6’9” who would certainly get more touches if Hansbrough was out of the picture. He may not wait around for Tyler to take off, as Wright is the third-ranked player behind Oden and Durant for the upcoming draft. Point guard Ty Lawson (10.3 pts, 5.2 asts, 53%) reminds many of another Raymond Felton, and he served Arizona notice with an 18 point, 8 assist performance in their drubbing of the ‘Cats. With four upper-classman on their roster, inexperience could be the Achilles Tar Heel, if you will, meaning 6’8” senior Reyshawn Terry may end up as the catalyst for this team. Yes, the kids can score, but if Terry can’t give them key defensive rebounds and an inside presence late in the game, they could be upset early, especially if an opponent manages to get Hansbrough in foul trouble.
Arizona has been my team for 12 years. I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the Wildcats. It seems that they are more than a little schizophrenic this season, going 17-8, with some big wins against Memphis and Oregon and then laying an absolute egg in a catastrophic performance against North Carolina. Going into that Carolina game all the hype was about the Pac-10, and how strong it is this year, and then Carolina handed a 28-point spanking to the Cats. I still think the Pac-10 is where it’s at this year though. There is a lot of buzz about Marcus Williams (16.7 pts, 7.1 reb) and even more lately about Chase Budinger (pictured above as the dunking, curly-haired white guy), the freshman who recently torched Oregon for 30 points and ten rebounds. I’ve seen him play a few times, and he’s either on fire from the outside, or he’s flat out useless. Two nights before burning Oregon he had 4 points on 1-7 shooting against Oregon St. The first Arizona game I saw this season was against UNC and I was left mumbling, “this is the Budinger kid everyone raves about?” He might as well have been bringing fresh pens to the coaching staff. Then I see him a few weeks later and he looks dominant against Oregon. Basically, for Budinger the sky is the limit, but he has yet to show up on a nightly basis. He’s 6’7”, used to play volleyball and has an incredible vertical leap, rumored to be 45 inches. The only catch is that he’s built like a volleyball player, meaning he’ll need to put on some muscle to be a force inside and out. In a perfect world, Williams, Budinger and frosh big-man Jordan Hill would all play together next year. Instead, Budinger and Williams will likely bounce to the League next season while I’m left to do nothing more than rant for the next two years about what this team could have become.
Keeping with the Pac-10, I finally saw the much-hyped Aaron Brooks of the Oregon Ducks. He reminded of a mini-Gilbert Arenas—high volume shooter who won’t blow you away with athleticism but can score around the basket by contorting his body in a number of ways. He’ll never dunk on anybody, but you won’t see him get his shot blocked often either. Impressive for a guy who stands 6’0” tall and 165 lbs. Oregon however has lost 4 of its last 5 games, with Brooks shooting 17-61 (27.8%) from the field. All things considered, Brooks strikes me as a big-game player. With the game on the line, in the tourney, I predict Brooks makes some clutch, game-winning plays.
If I had to pick a player of the year right now, I’d go with Durant. His numbers are insane and he is the only player who could be picked ahead of Greg Oden. David Stern, you’ve done it again, it’s a shame this year will be defined as the year of the composite basketball fiasco. As for you, loyal reader, get some rest. In two weeks, it’s time to embrace the Madness.

Posted on February 19, 2007 12:00 AM




Comments
Florida lost to Vandy on Saturday and didn't look good at all. Vandy shut down Noah and Horford (pretty much everybody elso too). I've got to mention that I'm disappointed that you don't consider a win against Kentucky as a big win for Florida (although I'm probably a little biased).
Posted by: Zach | February 19, 2007 4:04 AM
I'm a diehard Tarheel fan (have been in school here in CH for ummm...six years now), and well I couldn't agree more on your thoughts. I love watching Reyshawn play, he's nuts but he'll definitely be important in any kind of March run we may have.
If you keep getting more and more frustrated with your Wildcats, just google some videos on Jerryd Bayless, a kid yall've got coming in next year. HE'S SICK!
Still think the age limit should be 20,
Andrew
Posted by: Andrew | February 19, 2007 12:32 PM
Why does the guy next to me in the coffee shop stink so bad? Someone could seriously ask him to take a shower now and then. Not me, but someone.
Glad this is in the ether now. I didn't read the article, but I love posting stuff. I hope I don't get addicted to this kind of thing. God already hates me enough.
Posted by: Matt Lane | February 19, 2007 4:57 PM
I'd agree with the fact that the PAC-10 has a lot of talent this year. The ACC has been disappointing, minus UNC, and the Big Ten won't get the title because there's so little wiggle room for Indiana, Michigan State or Purdue behind the #1 and #2 teams in the country. And it would be nice to give Wisconsin just a little more than just an argumentative mention in the introductory paragraph.
Posted by: Robert | February 20, 2007 12:18 PM
Wisconsin would get more than an arguable mention if i'd seen them play all year. I've only seen highlights. I've read they often look ordinary. I've heard Alando Tucker is amazing. We'll keep an eye on it. Thanks for reading.
Posted by: Jon | February 20, 2007 2:02 PM
I have to side with Bobby Knight on this issue, Jonathan. Although the freshman class talent has raised its level of play in the NCAA ranks this year, this rule basically lays the foundation for these students to competently attend class for one lousy semester of college. These super studs have to remain above the acceptable NCAA GPA for one semester, then they can flop their classes in the Spring because, "Hey, I'm about to be a millionaire."
I imagine this rule was instituted to raise the importance of education and maturity for professional basketball players, but it was a weak attempt. Sure, I admit that college athletes, particularly young men who play football and basketball, probably get "aided" through college as it is. Whereas the NFL pretends to care about the maturity of young men, the NBA doesn't even put up a smoke screen.
David Stern's rule promotes education about as successfully as the "No Child Left Behind" initiative. Yay for basketball. Boo for education.
Posted by: Cory | February 20, 2007 2:52 PM
One thing I probably should have mentioned in the article is this;
David Stern did not institute this rule so that the players who eventually play in the NBA would get some semblance of an education. This was simply a move that would stop players from coming out too early and ruining potentially bright careers. He simply is trying to raise the product that is on the floor in his league. Too many ill-prepared, high-potential players play minutes they aren't ready for, and the quality of basketball is decreasing.
The LeBrons, and Greg Odens-- those guys would always be fine. But for every James and Oden there are 20 Lenny Cooke's and DeAngelo Collins'.
On top of that you could start the "should have went to college" team featuring; Darius Miles, Travis Outlaw, Sebastian Telfair, Ndi Ebi etc...
College teaches these players to play a more structured style of basketball, something they may not have had to do in high school.
Posted by: Jon | February 21, 2007 12:57 PM
I'm not sure I would have chosen Joakim Noah as the face of this (or any) article, but it was an enjoyable piece nonetheless. If anything stands out about the tourney this year, it's the clear lack of a favorite. I've no doubt that my bracket will be saturated with tears by the final weekend.
Predicton time:
1) The Pac-10 will once again disappoint.
2) Nobody will look past the likes of Bradley and Wichita State.
3) Duke and Coach K will be back in form by March after foolishly scheduling only one game away from Cameron in their first 15.
4) Josh Heytvelt (Gonzaga's hallucinogenic fungi afficionado) will be kicking himself for the next 40 years.
5) A 3 or 4 seed will be playing in the championship game (Syracuse stylee).
And now if you'll excuse me, I need to step away to babysit 62 inches of high-definition college basketball.
Posted by: Steve | February 21, 2007 6:10 PM
Can no one give Texas A&M any love? Any love at all? Personally, I see them defeating UT & Durant in the Big XII Championship and going farther than anyone expects them. Yes, they play in a major conference, but their lack of basketball success in recent years has them playing this year with the same chip on their shoulders that the good mid-majors have. I'm looking for them to have a great March.
Posted by: Adam P. Newton | February 22, 2007 7:55 AM
Sweet article! The PAC10 is so tough this year hopefuly the high level of competition will pay off in the big dance. Go Ducks!
Posted by: Paul Wright | February 27, 2007 12:35 AM
Go Ducks indeed.
Steve, by Duke being "back in form", do you mean an undeserved seed and a Sweet 16 exit?
Also, by Pac 10 once again disappointing, do you mean we'll get to the lost in the National Championship like we did last year?
Posted by: Jordan Green | February 27, 2007 12:45 AM
I meant that Duke will beat the teams it should beat and probably make yet another trip to the Sweet 16. Will they get an undeservedly high seed? Maybe. Are they the beneficiaries of a winning tradition? Probably. Is there a single active coach with a better record of preparing his team for the tourney than coach K? Doubtful. And for the record, I can't stand Duke. It goes back to 1993 when Christian Laettner stepped on a Kentucky player. Cherokee Parks' haircut was the final straw.
And I'm sorry, but UCLA's impressive run last year doesn't make up for the repeated disappointments the Pac-10 has subjected us too in the past decade, much in the same way our colder-than-average winter cannot serve to disprove global warming (don't tell Rush Limbaugh though). Nonetheless, I will be rooting for the Ducks and the other Pac-10 teams that make it in the hopes that their success will cause FSN to cover more of their games and fewer WCC blockbusters like Santa Clara vs. Pepperdine.
Posted by: Steve | February 28, 2007 6:38 PM